Re: Eq. (1), not Eq. 1

2011-05-13 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/13/2011 9:30 PM, Ken wrote: In LyX, if I write Eq. and then add a [reference] to an equation label, the pdf shows: Eq. 1 How do I change the format to show...? Eq. (1) Do I have to do this on an item by item basis? That is, should I simply be adding the parenthesis manually by writing

Re: Eq. (1), not Eq. 1

2011-05-13 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/13/2011 9:30 PM, Ken wrote: In LyX, if I write Eq. and then add a [reference] to an equation label, the pdf shows: Eq. 1 How do I change the format to show...? Eq. (1) Do I have to do this on an item by item basis? That is, should I simply be adding the parenthesis manually by writing

Re: Eq. (1), not Eq. 1

2011-05-13 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/13/2011 9:30 PM, Ken wrote: In LyX, if I write "Eq. " and then add a [reference] to an equation label, the pdf shows: Eq. 1 How do I change the format to show...? Eq. (1) Do I have to do this on an item by item basis? That is, should I simply be adding the parenthesis manually by writing

Re: Portable LyX

2011-05-09 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/9/2011 6:43 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Drazickdrazic...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. Is there a way to use LyX in Portable Mode without installing MiKTeX? I want to be able to edit TeX files and produce PDF without installing programs (Use only portable

Re: Portable LyX

2011-05-09 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/9/2011 8:08 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: The question now is that whether Lyx stores all the settings files in the installation directory itself, and not use registry (for windows, etc). Perhaps one of the developers could have answer to this more specific question. LyX uses

Re: Portable LyX

2011-05-09 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/9/2011 6:43 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Drazickdrazic...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. Is there a way to use LyX in Portable Mode without installing MiKTeX? I want to be able to edit TeX files and produce PDF without installing programs (Use only portable

Re: Portable LyX

2011-05-09 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/9/2011 8:08 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: The question now is that whether Lyx stores all the settings files in the installation directory itself, and not use registry (for windows, etc). Perhaps one of the developers could have answer to this more specific question. LyX uses

Re: Portable LyX

2011-05-09 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/9/2011 6:43 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Drazick wrote: Hello. Is there a way to use LyX in Portable Mode without installing MiKTeX? I want to be able to edit TeX files and produce PDF without installing programs (Use only portable

Re: Portable LyX

2011-05-09 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/9/2011 8:08 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote: The question now is that whether Lyx stores all the settings files in the installation directory itself, and not use registry (for windows, etc). Perhaps one of the developers could have answer to this more specific question. LyX uses

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

2011-05-07 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/7/2011 1:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: No File Import Gnumeric here (fedora 14 lyx-2.0.0-0.21.rc3.fc14.x86_64) What am I missing? Maybe Gnumeric. And perhaps LyX 2.0. Liviu After installing Gnumeric, path to its

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

2011-05-07 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/7/2011 1:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: No File Import Gnumeric here (fedora 14 lyx-2.0.0-0.21.rc3.fc14.x86_64) What am I missing? Maybe Gnumeric. And perhaps LyX 2.0. Liviu After installing Gnumeric, path to its

Re: Feature request: the missing element in the LyX office suite

2011-05-07 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 5/7/2011 1:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Neal Becker wrote: No File> Import> Gnumeric here (fedora 14 lyx-2.0.0-0.21.rc3.fc14.x86_64) What am I missing? Maybe Gnumeric. And perhaps LyX 2.0. Liviu After installing Gnumeric, path to

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-23 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/17/2011 12:12 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: The problem is indeed that Hunspell dictionaries are missing in the installer. This will be fixed in RC3. Ok, thanks. This was the plan indeed - to use the dictionaries from LyX's SVN to integrate it in the installers. Stephan All the issues

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-23 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/17/2011 12:12 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: The problem is indeed that Hunspell dictionaries are missing in the installer. This will be fixed in RC3. Ok, thanks. This was the plan indeed - to use the dictionaries from LyX's SVN to integrate it in the installers. Stephan All the issues

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-23 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/17/2011 12:12 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: The problem is indeed that Hunspell dictionaries are missing in the installer. This will be fixed in RC3. Ok, thanks. This was the plan indeed - to use the dictionaries from LyX's SVN to integrate it in the installers. Stephan All the issues

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-18 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/18/2011 12:22 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Yes, you can do this, of course. And I have this on my ToDo list already. But it's a little bit more than simply reporting an error: 1) the spell checker shouldn't be enabled when not functional - if no dictionaries are found 2) the spell checker may

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-18 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/18/2011 12:22 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Yes, you can do this, of course. And I have this on my ToDo list already. But it's a little bit more than simply reporting an error: 1) the spell checker shouldn't be enabled when not functional - if no dictionaries are found 2) the spell checker may

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-18 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/18/2011 12:22 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Yes, you can do this, of course. And I have this on my ToDo list already. But it's a little bit more than simply reporting an error: 1) the spell checker shouldn't be enabled when not functional - if no dictionaries are found 2) the spell checker may

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-17 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/17/2011 12:12 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 17.04.2011 um 03:12 schrieb Joost Verburg: No, we don't use Aspell anymore. To clarify this a little bit: the decision which spell checker engines LyX can use is made by the packager - it depends on the build environment, that's the platform and

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-17 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/17/2011 12:12 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 17.04.2011 um 03:12 schrieb Joost Verburg: No, we don't use Aspell anymore. To clarify this a little bit: the decision which spell checker engines LyX can use is made by the packager - it depends on the build environment, that's the platform and

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-17 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
On 4/17/2011 12:12 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 17.04.2011 um 03:12 schrieb Joost Verburg: No, we don't use Aspell anymore. To clarify this a little bit: the decision which spell checker engines LyX can use is made by the packager - it depends on the build environment, that's the platform and

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-16 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
--- On Fri, 15/4/11, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 15.04.2011 um 09:14 schrieb Ganesh Sundaram: I installed L yx 2.0 RC2 (for Windows) recently. However, I have difficulty getting spell checker to work. Whenever I invoke the spellchecker, Lyx displays a dialogbox with the message

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-16 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
--- On Fri, 15/4/11, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 15.04.2011 um 09:14 schrieb Ganesh Sundaram: I installed L yx 2.0 RC2 (for Windows) recently. However, I have difficulty getting spell checker to work. Whenever I invoke the spellchecker, Lyx displays a dialogbox with the message

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-16 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
--- On Fri, 15/4/11, Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net> wrote: Am 15.04.2011 um 09:14 schrieb Ganesh Sundaram: > I installed L yx 2.0 RC2 (for Windows) recently. However, I have difficulty > getting spell checker to work. Whenever I invoke the spellchecker, Lyx > displ

spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-15 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
I installed L yx 2.0 RC2 (for Windows) recently. However, I have difficulty getting spell checker to work. Whenever I invoke the spellchecker, Lyx displays a dialogbox with the message We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the begginning? I know for sure that

spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-15 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
I installed L yx 2.0 RC2 (for Windows) recently. However, I have difficulty getting spell checker to work. Whenever I invoke the spellchecker, Lyx displays a dialogbox with the message We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the begginning? I know for sure that

spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

2011-04-15 Thread Ganesh Sundaram
I installed L yx 2.0 RC2 (for Windows) recently. However, I have difficulty getting spell checker to work. Whenever I invoke the spellchecker, Lyx displays a dialogbox with the message "We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the begginning?" I know for sure that