Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 15:10, Chris Lale wrote: Hello José. Success! Thank you again. Good. I have created a textclass that produces the docbook screen/screen tags. This is what I did (by modifying copies of existing files). 1. Create a file

Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 09:53, Chris Lale wrote: Hello José. Thanks for your help. You are welcome. Don't hesitate to ask in case of any doubt. :-) [...] Can you tell me how to get started? Is there a HOWTO I sould read? Do I need to find out more about LaTeX to learn how to add an

Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 15:10, Chris Lale wrote: Hello José. Success! Thank you again. Good. I have created a textclass that produces the docbook screen/screen tags. This is what I did (by modifying copies of existing files). 1. Create a file

Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 09:53, Chris Lale wrote: > Hello José. > > Thanks for your help. You are welcome. Don't hesitate to ask in case of any doubt. :-) [...] > Can you tell me how to get started? Is there a HOWTO I sould read? Do I > need to find out more about LaTeX to learn how to add

Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 15:10, Chris Lale wrote: > Hello José. Success! Thank you again. Good. > I have created a textclass that produces the docbook > tags. This is what I did (by modifying copies of existing files). > > 1. Create a file /usr/share/lyx/layouts/docbook-newbiedoc.layout: >

Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-25 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Saturday 23 November 2002 09:03, Chris Lale wrote: I am using Lyx (1.1.6fix4) to compose DocBook articles. Can I add my favourite DocBook SGML tags as items in the environment menu? I am new to Lyx and LaTeX. Yes, but those should be paragraph level elements to have a more wysiwym look.

Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-25 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Saturday 23 November 2002 09:03, Chris Lale wrote: I am using Lyx (1.1.6fix4) to compose DocBook articles. Can I add my favourite DocBook SGML tags as items in the environment menu? I am new to Lyx and LaTeX. Yes, but those should be paragraph level elements to have a more wysiwym look.

Re: DocBook SGML

2002-11-25 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Saturday 23 November 2002 09:03, Chris Lale wrote: > I am using Lyx (1.1.6fix4) to compose DocBook articles. Can I add my > favourite DocBook SGML tags as items in the environment menu? I am new > to Lyx and LaTeX. Yes, but those should be paragraph level elements to have a more wysiwym

Re: Newbie questions

2002-11-20 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 04:52, Christian Ridderström wrote: You'll probably have lots of use for your latex-person :-) Here's a very hackish solution for how to get rid of the section and subsection numbers... it's in a wiki, so anybody who knows better can add a better solution:

Re: Newbie questions

2002-11-20 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 04:52, Christian Ridderström wrote: You'll probably have lots of use for your latex-person :-) Here's a very hackish solution for how to get rid of the section and subsection numbers... it's in a wiki, so anybody who knows better can add a better solution:

Re: Newbie questions

2002-11-20 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 04:52, Christian Ridderström wrote: > > You'll probably have lots of use for your "latex"-person :-) > > Here's a very hackish solution for how to get rid of the section and > subsection numbers... it's in a "wiki", so anybody who knows better can > add a better

Re: pasting ASCII text into lyx is not possible?!

2002-11-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 15 November 2002 10:08, Jörn Lindmaier wrote: Hello, I have just installed Lyx (on a Linux PC) and found out, that I can not paste ASCII text I cpoied from another application or URLs into a lyx Document. This can't be true, or can it?!? Select the document and past it with the

Re: pasting ASCII text into lyx is not possible?!

2002-11-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 15 November 2002 12:11, Jörn Lindmaier wrote: Select the document and past it with the middle button. This I can not do as I have set the middlebutton for close window. But In the middle of text? I have never saw such setup. it should nevertheless work with ctrl+v - but it

Re: pasting ASCII text into lyx is not possible?!

2002-11-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 15 November 2002 10:08, Jörn Lindmaier wrote: Hello, I have just installed Lyx (on a Linux PC) and found out, that I can not paste ASCII text I cpoied from another application or URLs into a lyx Document. This can't be true, or can it?!? Select the document and past it with the

Re: pasting ASCII text into lyx is not possible?!

2002-11-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 15 November 2002 12:11, Jörn Lindmaier wrote: Select the document and past it with the middle button. This I can not do as I have set the middlebutton for close window. But In the middle of text? I have never saw such setup. it should nevertheless work with ctrl+v - but it

Re: pasting ASCII text into lyx is not possible?!

2002-11-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 15 November 2002 10:08, Jörn Lindmaier wrote: > Hello, > I have just installed Lyx (on a Linux PC) and found out, that I can not > paste ASCII text I cpoied from another application or URLs into a lyx > Document. This can't be true, or can it?!? Select the document and past it with

Re: pasting ASCII text into lyx is not possible?!

2002-11-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 15 November 2002 12:11, Jörn Lindmaier wrote: > > > > Select the document and past it with the middle button. > > This I can not do as I have set the middlebutton for "close" window. But In the middle of text? I have never saw such setup. > it should nevertheless work with ctrl+v -

Re: Docbook problems

2002-11-08 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 17:18, Matej Cepl wrote: Hi, Hi, I'm sorry for replaying so late but I have been busy before. I am a total newbie in Docbook area, so I have tried to create a short document (with rich structure) to try it. However, I do not seem to be able to make .sgml

Re: Docbook problems

2002-11-08 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 17:18, Matej Cepl wrote: Hi, Hi, I'm sorry for replaying so late but I have been busy before. I am a total newbie in Docbook area, so I have tried to create a short document (with rich structure) to try it. However, I do not seem to be able to make .sgml

Re: Docbook problems

2002-11-08 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 17:18, Matej Cepl wrote: > Hi, Hi, I'm sorry for replaying so late but I have been busy before. > I am a total newbie in Docbook area, so I have tried to create > a short document (with rich structure) to try it. However, > I do not seem to be able to make

Re: Who has RPMs for redhat 7.x? [please!]

2002-10-31 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 31 October 2002 18:36, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: I would be happy to be the RPM coordinator. I just need a loose collection of people with different system setups who are willing to --rebuild the source rpm and send the results back to me. And I think that the rpms could also be

Re: Who has RPMs for redhat 7.x? [please!]

2002-10-31 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 31 October 2002 18:36, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: I would be happy to be the RPM coordinator. I just need a loose collection of people with different system setups who are willing to --rebuild the source rpm and send the results back to me. And I think that the rpms could also be

Re: Who has RPMs for redhat 7.x? [please!]

2002-10-31 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 31 October 2002 18:36, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > > I would be happy to be the RPM coordinator. I just need a loose collection > of people with different system setups who are willing to "--rebuild" > the source rpm and send the results back to me. And I think that the rpms could

Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?

2002-10-30 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 15:43, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which

Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?

2002-10-30 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 15:43, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which

Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?

2002-10-30 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 15:43, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > Where did you get it? I found "lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm" on fr2 > [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 > mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already > have tetex-latex installed,

Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?

2002-10-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 15:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer:

Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?

2002-10-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 15:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer:

Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?

2002-10-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 15:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and > libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but > couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks > from my other computer:

Re: determining next style

2002-10-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 18 October 2002 04:56, Paul Tremblay wrote: I have defined the following style: Style Reg Preamble \usepackage{ragged2e} \setlength{\RaggedRightParindent}{\parindent} \RaggedRight EndPreamble MarginFirst_Dynamic Align Left LabelType

Re: Roadmap for LyX Docbook?

2002-10-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 17 October 2002 13:15, Gour wrote: Hi! I just finished editing 2nd book on LyX, but soon I have to start working on some course and use DocBook as authoring format and I'm thinking about the possible roadmap in using LyX DocBook. Since I still believe that LyX DocBook produce

Re: determining next style

2002-10-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 18 October 2002 04:56, Paul Tremblay wrote: I have defined the following style: Style Reg Preamble \usepackage{ragged2e} \setlength{\RaggedRightParindent}{\parindent} \RaggedRight EndPreamble MarginFirst_Dynamic Align Left LabelType

Re: Roadmap for LyX Docbook?

2002-10-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 17 October 2002 13:15, Gour wrote: Hi! I just finished editing 2nd book on LyX, but soon I have to start working on some course and use DocBook as authoring format and I'm thinking about the possible roadmap in using LyX DocBook. Since I still believe that LyX DocBook produce

Re: determining next style

2002-10-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Friday 18 October 2002 04:56, Paul Tremblay wrote: > I have defined the following style: > > Style Reg > Preamble > \usepackage{ragged2e} > \setlength{\RaggedRightParindent}{\parindent} > \RaggedRight > EndPreamble > MarginFirst_Dynamic > Align Left >

Re: Roadmap for LyX & Docbook?

2002-10-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 17 October 2002 13:15, Gour wrote: > Hi! > > I just finished editing 2nd book on LyX, but soon I have to start working > on some course and use DocBook as authoring format and I'm thinking about > the possible roadmap in using LyX & DocBook. > > Since I still believe that LyX & DocBook

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 16:47, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: Sorry if this has already been asked, but I haven't found any related articles ... Not that I have noticed it. :-) I am using LyX 1.2.1 on Cygwin. Trying to insert graphics into documents using one of the standard LaTeX classes

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 17:18, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: Missed that line earlier. It is: !ENTITY graph path/file ] Note that it is not including the extension in the above path. That is on purpose, the stylesheets should choose between png|gif and eps, depending on the final

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 17:48, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: I am not entirely sure what you are asking me. Do you mean, if I have say gif and eps present in that directory? Sorry, I should have been clear before. Does it helps if you both versions of the figure? Like fig.eps and fig.png

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 16:47, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: Sorry if this has already been asked, but I haven't found any related articles ... Not that I have noticed it. :-) I am using LyX 1.2.1 on Cygwin. Trying to insert graphics into documents using one of the standard LaTeX classes

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 17:18, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: Missed that line earlier. It is: !ENTITY graph path/file ] Note that it is not including the extension in the above path. That is on purpose, the stylesheets should choose between png|gif and eps, depending on the final

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 17:48, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: I am not entirely sure what you are asking me. Do you mean, if I have say gif and eps present in that directory? Sorry, I should have been clear before. Does it helps if you both versions of the figure? Like fig.eps and fig.png

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 16:47, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: > Sorry if this has already been asked, but I haven't found any related > articles ... Not that I have noticed it. :-) > I am using LyX 1.2.1 on Cygwin. Trying to insert graphics into documents > using one of the standard LaTeX

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 17:18, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: > > Missed that line earlier. It is: > > ]> > > Note that it is not including the extension in the above path. That is on purpose, the stylesheets should choose between png|gif and eps, depending on the final format, say html or

Re: Graphics and Docbook

2002-10-15 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 17:48, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: > > I am not entirely sure what you are asking me. Do you mean, if I have say > gif and eps present in that directory? Sorry, I should have been clear before. Does it helps if you both versions of the figure? Like fig.eps and fig.png

Re: A question

2002-10-14 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 14 October 2002 07:50, Andre Poenitz wrote: Uh. I thought there was no LyX on Knoppix, but I just had a look, it's right there - and even in version 1.2.1. Hey, this is cool... [I seem to remember Klaus Knopper saying that he did not want to LyX because of its xforms

Re: A question

2002-10-14 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 14 October 2002 07:50, Andre Poenitz wrote: Uh. I thought there was no LyX on Knoppix, but I just had a look, it's right there - and even in version 1.2.1. Hey, this is cool... [I seem to remember Klaus Knopper saying that he did not want to LyX because of its xforms

Re: A question

2002-10-14 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 14 October 2002 07:50, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Uh. I thought there was no LyX on Knoppix, but I just had a look, it's > right there - and even in version 1.2.1. > > Hey, this is cool... > > [I seem to remember Klaus Knopper saying that he did not want to LyX > because of its xforms

Re: newbie question

2002-10-09 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 02:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings. I'm a new lyx user, and have just finished the very helpful tutorial at http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/lyx/index.htm. The course needs the following formatting: shaded boxes (a la fancybox package) graphics in

Re: newbie question

2002-10-09 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 02:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings. I'm a new lyx user, and have just finished the very helpful tutorial at http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/lyx/index.htm. The course needs the following formatting: shaded boxes (a la fancybox package) graphics in

Re: newbie question

2002-10-09 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 02:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings. > > I'm a new lyx user, and have just finished the very helpful tutorial > at http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/lyx/index.htm. > The course needs the following formatting: > > shaded boxes (a la fancybox package) >

Re: HTML editing

2002-10-07 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 07 October 2002 14:17, Graham Borland wrote: I'm using Lyx to edit a structured document which must be presented in HTML. I've found that I get the best results by using latex2html as the final conversion tool. A couple of questions: 1) On starting Lyx, I get this error message:

Re: HTML editing

2002-10-07 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 07 October 2002 14:17, Graham Borland wrote: I'm using Lyx to edit a structured document which must be presented in HTML. I've found that I get the best results by using latex2html as the final conversion tool. A couple of questions: 1) On starting Lyx, I get this error message:

Re: HTML editing

2002-10-07 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 07 October 2002 14:17, Graham Borland wrote: > I'm using Lyx to edit a structured document which must be presented in > HTML. I've found that I get the best results by using latex2html as > the final conversion tool. > > A couple of questions: > > 1) On starting Lyx, I get this error

Re: Trying to use lyx 1.2.1, getting nowhere fast ...

2002-09-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 26 September 2002 14:37, Ronald G Minnich wrote: Are tables in SGML just out of the question? You are referring to linuxdoc that is a dtd described by SGML, such as html or docbook. Now regarding the table question in linuxdoc. I have seen the description in the dtd, but I

Re: problems with latex2rtf

2002-09-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 26 September 2002 18:12, Nirmal Govind wrote: No, latex2rtf did not fail but I can't open the rtf file generated.. at least not in abiword.. never mind, I just tried OpenOffice and it opened the rtf file and the output is just as it looks in lyx.. Are you sure that abiword opens

Re: Trying to use lyx 1.2.1, getting nowhere fast ...

2002-09-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 26 September 2002 14:37, Ronald G Minnich wrote: Are tables in SGML just out of the question? You are referring to linuxdoc that is a dtd described by SGML, such as html or docbook. Now regarding the table question in linuxdoc. I have seen the description in the dtd, but I

Re: problems with latex2rtf

2002-09-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 26 September 2002 18:12, Nirmal Govind wrote: No, latex2rtf did not fail but I can't open the rtf file generated.. at least not in abiword.. never mind, I just tried OpenOffice and it opened the rtf file and the output is just as it looks in lyx.. Are you sure that abiword opens

Re: Trying to use lyx 1.2.1, getting nowhere fast ...

2002-09-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 26 September 2002 14:37, Ronald G Minnich wrote: > Are tables in SGML just out of the question? You are referring to linuxdoc that is a dtd described by SGML, such as html or docbook. Now regarding the table question in linuxdoc. I have seen the description in the dtd, but I

Re: problems with latex2rtf

2002-09-26 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 26 September 2002 18:12, Nirmal Govind wrote: > No, latex2rtf did not fail but I can't open the rtf file generated.. at > least not in abiword.. never mind, I just tried OpenOffice and it opened > the rtf file and the output is just as it looks in lyx.. Are you sure that abiword

Re: Graphics in Lyx DocBook

2002-09-17 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 15:57, David Cussans wrote: Hi, I would like to use Lyx to output DocBook SGML. I have installed Lyx 1.2.1 on my RH 7.3 system and have the docbook tool-set installed I have the same toolchain. Creating a new document using the Docbook template works,

Re: Graphics in Lyx DocBook

2002-09-17 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 15:57, David Cussans wrote: Hi, I would like to use Lyx to output DocBook SGML. I have installed Lyx 1.2.1 on my RH 7.3 system and have the docbook tool-set installed I have the same toolchain. Creating a new document using the Docbook template works,

Re: Graphics in Lyx "DocBook"

2002-09-17 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 15:57, David Cussans wrote: > Hi, > I would like to use Lyx to output DocBook SGML. I have installed Lyx > 1.2.1 on my RH 7.3 system and have the docbook tool-set installed I have the same toolchain. > Creating a new document using the Docbook template

Re: Importing HTML

2002-09-11 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 06:14:49PM -0400, Paul Tremblay wrote: [...] I agree that a xml file format has advantages and you have listed some of then. Paul ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE notes_on_xml !--a very incomplete version of what a LyX document might look like if converted to XML--

Re: Importing HTML

2002-09-11 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 06:14:49PM -0400, Paul Tremblay wrote: [...] I agree that a xml file format has advantages and you have listed some of then. Paul ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE notes_on_xml !--a very incomplete version of what a LyX document might look like if converted to XML--

Re: Importing HTML

2002-09-11 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 06:14:49PM -0400, Paul Tremblay wrote: [...] I agree that a xml file format has advantages and you have listed some of then. > Paul > > > > > > > > lyxformat="218" > textclass="article" > language="english" >

Re: docbook and tables

2002-09-09 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 09 September 2002 03:36, David Koski wrote: Hello, I have installed lyx 1.2.0 on SuSE with all the related packages (docbook, sgmltools, jade, tex, etc.) that come with 7.3 but after importing a latex document with floats, the db2dvi produces errors: document type does not allow

Re: docbook and tables

2002-09-09 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 09 September 2002 03:36, David Koski wrote: Hello, I have installed lyx 1.2.0 on SuSE with all the related packages (docbook, sgmltools, jade, tex, etc.) that come with 7.3 but after importing a latex document with floats, the db2dvi produces errors: document type does not allow

Re: docbook and tables

2002-09-09 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 09 September 2002 03:36, David Koski wrote: > Hello, > > I have installed lyx 1.2.0 on SuSE with all the related packages (docbook, > sgmltools, jade, tex, etc.) that come with 7.3 but after importing a latex > document with floats, the db2dvi produces errors: > > document type does not

Re: Subject: LyX 1.2.1 and RedHat 7.3

2002-08-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 29 August 2002 14:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I will not have time to put it there myself until Sep 13. So you'd better ask lars to do it. Make sure to nname it (and the rh 6.2 one) using the same scheme we had for 1.2.0. Ok it should be lyx-1.2.1-1rh73-xforms089.i386.rpm,

Re: Subject: LyX 1.2.1 and RedHat 7.3

2002-08-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 29 August 2002 14:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I will not have time to put it there myself until Sep 13. So you'd better ask lars to do it. Make sure to nname it (and the rh 6.2 one) using the same scheme we had for 1.2.0. Ok it should be lyx-1.2.1-1rh73-xforms089.i386.rpm,

Re: Subject: LyX 1.2.1 and RedHat 7.3

2002-08-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Thursday 29 August 2002 14:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I will not have time to put it there myself until Sep 13. So you'd > better ask lars to do it. Make sure to nname it (and the rh 6.2 one) > using the same scheme we had for 1.2.0. Ok it should be

Re: xforms question, (Trouble getting lyx 1.2.1 working...)

2002-08-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
it for the faculty) :-) Thanks, Pierre José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:59, Robert Spee wrote: I picked the xforms 1.0rc file, but when compiling that, my computer crashes. I will use 0.89, but I don't know how to build Lyx form source rpm. Can anyone give

Re: xforms question, (Trouble getting lyx 1.2.1 working...)

2002-08-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
it for the faculty) :-) Thanks, Pierre José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:59, Robert Spee wrote: I picked the xforms 1.0rc file, but when compiling that, my computer crashes. I will use 0.89, but I don't know how to build Lyx form source rpm. Can anyone give

Re: xforms question, (Trouble getting lyx 1.2.1 working...)

2002-08-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
; Could someone help me out, (or could RPM's be released similar to > lyx-1.2.0-1rh73-xforms089.i386.rpm). I f needed I can built such beast (I will eventually to distribute it for the faculty) :-) > Thanks, > Pierre > > José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 Au

Re: xforms question

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 13:07, Robert Spee wrote: Is there a way to let Lyx use another xform versions than 0.88? The rpm says it needs 0.88. Get the source rpm and compile it. I can do it with 0.89 and 1.0RC4 also. I have 0.88 installed from tar-ball and 0.89 from rpm. Does anybody

Re: lyx2lyx

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:07, Collette wrote: Hello, I was reading some mails on the lyx devel archive and saw there's a tool to convert old lyx files. Is there a useable version of this tool ? We are working on it for 1.3. At present the work is not yet complete, but it should be

Re: xforms question

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:43, Roberto Hernandez wrote: José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: Is there a way to let Lyx use another xform versions than 0.88? The rpm says it needs 0.88. Get the source rpm and compile it. I can do it with 0.89 and 1.0RC4 also. Do you mean the source

Re: xforms question

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 13:07, Robert Spee wrote: Is there a way to let Lyx use another xform versions than 0.88? The rpm says it needs 0.88. Get the source rpm and compile it. I can do it with 0.89 and 1.0RC4 also. I have 0.88 installed from tar-ball and 0.89 from rpm. Does anybody

Re: lyx2lyx

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:07, Collette wrote: Hello, I was reading some mails on the lyx devel archive and saw there's a tool to convert old lyx files. Is there a useable version of this tool ? We are working on it for 1.3. At present the work is not yet complete, but it should be

Re: xforms question

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:43, Roberto Hernandez wrote: José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: Is there a way to let Lyx use another xform versions than 0.88? The rpm says it needs 0.88. Get the source rpm and compile it. I can do it with 0.89 and 1.0RC4 also. Do you mean the source

Re: xforms question

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 13:07, Robert Spee wrote: > Is there a way to let Lyx use another xform versions than 0.88? > The rpm says it needs 0.88. Get the source rpm and compile it. I can do it with 0.89 and 1.0RC4 also. > I have 0.88 installed from tar-ball and 0.89 from rpm. Does anybody

Re: lyx2lyx

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:07, Collette wrote: > Hello, > > I was reading some mails on the lyx devel archive and saw there's a tool > to convert old lyx files. > Is there a useable version of this tool ? We are working on it for 1.3. At present the work is not yet complete, but it

Re: xforms question

2002-08-21 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 14:43, Roberto Hernandez wrote: > José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > >>Is there a way to let Lyx use another xform versions than 0.88? > >>The rpm says it needs 0.88. > > > > Get the source rpm and compile it. I can do it with 0.8

Re: exporting docbook has tag errors

2002-08-19 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:59:35AM -0700, David Koski wrote: Hello, When exporting docbook from lyx I get a nice file.sgml document but when I execute db2tex file.sgml there are errors with the sgml tags that are produced by lyx. For example: [...] --- version of lyx:

Re: lyx - docbook - rtf, etc.

2002-08-19 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:05:50AM -0700, David Koski wrote: Hello, Anyone using lyx to produce docbook to convert to rtf, or pdf? I haven't had much success. What are the problems you have? David Koski [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)

Re: exporting docbook has tag errors

2002-08-19 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:59:35AM -0700, David Koski wrote: Hello, When exporting docbook from lyx I get a nice file.sgml document but when I execute db2tex file.sgml there are errors with the sgml tags that are produced by lyx. For example: [...] --- version of lyx:

Re: lyx - docbook - rtf, etc.

2002-08-19 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:05:50AM -0700, David Koski wrote: Hello, Anyone using lyx to produce docbook to convert to rtf, or pdf? I haven't had much success. What are the problems you have? David Koski [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)

Re: exporting docbook has tag errors

2002-08-19 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:59:35AM -0700, David Koski wrote: > Hello, > > When exporting docbook from lyx I get a nice file.sgml document but when > I execute "db2tex file.sgml" there are errors with the sgml tags that are > produced by lyx. For example: > [...] > --- > > version of lyx:

Re: lyx -> docbook -> rtf, etc.

2002-08-19 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:05:50AM -0700, David Koski wrote: > Hello, > > Anyone using lyx to produce docbook to convert to rtf, or pdf? I haven't had much >success. What are the problems you have? > David Koski > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect match.

Re: [PATCH] wide float toggle

2002-07-24 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 15:08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Sorry, wrong list :-( At least is related. ;-) Jürgen -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] wide float toggle

2002-07-24 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 15:08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Sorry, wrong list :-( At least is related. ;-) Jürgen -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] wide float toggle

2002-07-24 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 15:08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Sorry, wrong list :-( At least is related. ;-) > Jürgen -- José Abílio

Re: conversion to linuxdoc

2002-07-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote: Hello, this is related to LyX-1.2.0 . I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs. So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website and finally took a glimpse at the

Re: conversion to linuxdoc

2002-07-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote: Hello, this is related to LyX-1.2.0 . I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs. So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website and finally took a glimpse at the

Re: conversion to linuxdoc

2002-07-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote: > Hello, > > this is related to LyX-1.2.0 . > I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to > Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs. > So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website and finally > took a glimpse

Re: Docbook status in 1.2.0

2002-07-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 15 July 2002 15:29, Kevin Page wrote: Cann't they already? It didn't seem to just work. Looking at the test, this isn't really a problem, just because the fileref wasn't to the actual file (which could be fixed by hand). As for rendering figure reference numbers, I guess this

Re: Docbook status in 1.2.0

2002-07-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 15 July 2002 15:29, Kevin Page wrote: Cann't they already? It didn't seem to just work. Looking at the test, this isn't really a problem, just because the fileref wasn't to the actual file (which could be fixed by hand). As for rendering figure reference numbers, I guess this

Re: Docbook status in 1.2.0

2002-07-18 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 15 July 2002 15:29, Kevin Page wrote: > > Cann't they already? > > It didn't seem to "just work". Looking at the test, this isn't really > a problem, just because the fileref wasn't to the actual file (which > could be fixed by hand). As for rendering figure reference numbers, I >

Re: Docbook status in 1.2.0

2002-07-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:43, Kevin Page wrote: Hi, I've used lyx previously (very successfully, I may add - thanks!) in the past for creating LaTeX based output. I'm writing my thesis, and would ideally like the base document to use DocBook. Good. :-) I've have a brief experiment

Re: Docbook status in 1.2.0

2002-07-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 02:43, Kevin Page wrote: Hi, I've used lyx previously (very successfully, I may add - thanks!) in the past for creating LaTeX based output. I'm writing my thesis, and would ideally like the base document to use DocBook. Good. :-) I've have a brief experiment

<    1   2   3   >