Re: eLyXer for Document Parsing

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:03:00 -0700 Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote: Dear eLyXer Users and Developers, I'm still at work on the import/export module for Microsoft Word documents. I'm making pretty good progress. I've got a rough prototype that works pretty well and I'm now starting to

Re: eLyXer for Document Parsing

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:00:24 -0700 Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote: Hi Steve, [clip] One more question: You sure you want to go in-memory? What happens if a guy has a 1200 page book with 100 chapters each containing 10 sections, each containing 10 subsections, and tries to parse it on

Re: eLyXer for Document Parsing

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:03:00 -0700 Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote: Dear eLyXer Users and Developers, I'm still at work on the import/export module for Microsoft Word documents. I'm making pretty good progress. I've got a rough prototype that works pretty well and I'm now starting to

Re: eLyXer for Document Parsing

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:00:24 -0700 Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote: Hi Steve, [clip] One more question: You sure you want to go in-memory? What happens if a guy has a 1200 page book with 100 chapters each containing 10 sections, each containing 10 subsections, and tries to parse it on

Re: eLyXer for Document Parsing

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:03:00 -0700 Rob Oakes wrote: > Dear eLyXer Users and Developers, > > I'm still at work on the import/export module for Microsoft Word > documents. I'm making pretty good progress. I've got a rough > prototype that works pretty well and I'm now

Re: eLyXer for Document Parsing

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:00:24 -0700 Rob Oakes wrote: > Hi Steve, [clip] > > One more question: You sure you want to go in-memory? What happens > > if a guy has a 1200 page book with 100 chapters each containing 10 > > sections, each containing 10 subsections, and tries to

Re: How NOT to require chapters to start on odd pages? SOLVED

On Monday 08 June 2009 05:58:46 pm you wrote: On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:29:45 -0400 Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote: Hi all, My latest book has a layout based on the book document class. Even when I uncheck two sided document it still prints a blank even page if the preceding

Re: How NOT to require chapters to start on odd pages? SOLVED

On Monday 08 June 2009 05:58:46 pm you wrote: On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:29:45 -0400 Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote: Hi all, My latest book has a layout based on the book document class. Even when I uncheck two sided document it still prints a blank even page if the preceding

Re: How NOT to require chapters to start on odd pages?

On Monday 08 June 2009 05:58:46 pm you wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:29:45 -0400 > > Steve Litt wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > My latest book has a layout based on the book document class. Even > > when I uncheck "two sided document" it still prints a blank even page > >

Re: Hyphenation for German in LyX-1.2.1

On Wednesday 30 October 2002 10:05 pm, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: Matthias Bunk wrote: Hello, in LyX-1.1.6 I wrote \hyphenation{ bla-bla } in the LaTeX preamble and it works. But LyX-1.2.1 wrote \usepackage{babel} after the LaTeX preamble and so the \hyphenation{ bla-bla } from the

Re: Hyphenation for German in LyX-1.2.1

On Wednesday 30 October 2002 10:05 pm, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: Matthias Bunk wrote: Hello, in LyX-1.1.6 I wrote \hyphenation{ bla-bla } in the LaTeX preamble and it works. But LyX-1.2.1 wrote \usepackage{babel} after the LaTeX preamble and so the \hyphenation{ bla-bla } from the

Re: Hyphenation for German in LyX-1.2.1

On Wednesday 30 October 2002 10:05 pm, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > Matthias Bunk wrote: > > Hello, > > > > in LyX-1.1.6 I wrote "\hyphenation{ bla-bla }" in the LaTeX preamble and > > it works. But LyX-1.2.1 wrote "\usepackage{babel}" after the LaTeX > > preamble and so the "\hyphenation{

Re: Gratitude!

On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:11 am, Darren Freeman wrote: Dear lists, I have just finished an enormous piece of work using LyX (my first *important* document done using LyX). I would like to express my deepest gratitude to those who have helped me in any way over the past few weeks. I

Re: Gratitude!

On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:11 am, Darren Freeman wrote: Dear lists, I have just finished an enormous piece of work using LyX (my first *important* document done using LyX). I would like to express my deepest gratitude to those who have helped me in any way over the past few weeks. I

Re: Gratitude!

On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:11 am, Darren Freeman wrote: > Dear lists, > > I have just finished an enormous piece of work using LyX (my first > *important* document done using LyX). > > I would like to express my deepest gratitude to those who have helped me > in any way over the past few

Re: Small poll - Results

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:47 pm, John Levon wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:30:02PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote: Anyway, I've been a happy user of Lyx for 5 years and I could live with the xforms junk for another 5 if need be. Lyx is _that_ good (currently finishing my dissertation

Re: Small poll - Results

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:47 pm, John Levon wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:30:02PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote: Anyway, I've been a happy user of Lyx for 5 years and I could live with the xforms junk for another 5 if need be. Lyx is _that_ good (currently finishing my dissertation

Re: Small poll - Results

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:47 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:30:02PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote: > > Anyway, I've been a happy user of Lyx for 5 years and I could live with > > the xforms junk for another 5 if need be. Lyx is _that_ good (currently > > finishing my

Re: Small poll

On Monday 28 October 2002 01:40 am, you wrote: Just a small poll [As background: the Qt frontend is the single big item on the 1.3 list that's not done and won't be finished within the next few weeks.] What would _you_ prefer if you had the choice: (a) have 1.3.0 now as-is with its barely

Re: Small poll

On Monday 28 October 2002 12:16 pm, John Levon wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 04:42:18PM +, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote: won't hurt. And, as you all are probably tired of hearing me say, BY FAR the worst LyX deficiency is the lack of character styles, and that should be top priority

Re: Small poll

On Monday 28 October 2002 01:40 am, you wrote: Just a small poll [As background: the Qt frontend is the single big item on the 1.3 list that's not done and won't be finished within the next few weeks.] What would _you_ prefer if you had the choice: (a) have 1.3.0 now as-is with its barely

Re: Small poll

On Monday 28 October 2002 12:16 pm, John Levon wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 04:42:18PM +, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote: won't hurt. And, as you all are probably tired of hearing me say, BY FAR the worst LyX deficiency is the lack of character styles, and that should be top priority

Re: Small poll

On Monday 28 October 2002 01:40 am, you wrote: > Just a small poll [As background: the Qt frontend is the single big item on > the 1.3 list that's not done and won't be finished within the next few > weeks.] > > What would _you_ prefer if you had the choice: > > (a) have 1.3.0 now as-is with its

Re: Small poll

On Monday 28 October 2002 12:16 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 04:42:18PM +, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote: > > > won't hurt. And, as you all are probably tired of hearing me say, BY > > > FAR the worst LyX deficiency is the lack of character styles, and > > > that should be top