Paul Barrett wrote:
Travis Oliphant wrote:
I am looking for feedback on the PEP. Of particular interest is the
specification of multidimensional indexing that I've outlined. I
think it is mostly the same as numarray (I'd love some feedback to be
sure about that), except for the fact that
On Thursday 17 February 2005 16:51, Colin J. Williams wrote:
I don't see the need for hierarchical type classes, though it might
ease the comparison with Python types.
I see some small potential benefit, particularly with the addition of
non-numeric types.
I am pushing forward for a
Paul Barrett wrote:
Travis Oliphant wrote:
I am looking for feedback on the PEP. Of particular interest is the
specification of multidimensional indexing that I've outlined. I
think it is mostly the same as numarray (I'd love some feedback to be
sure about that), except for the fact that
On Thursday 17 February 2005 16:51, Colin J. Williams wrote:
I don't see the need for hierarchical type classes, though it might
ease the comparison with Python types.
I see some small potential benefit, particularly with the addition of
non-numeric types.
I am pushing forward for a
Paul Barrett wrote:
Travis Oliphant wrote:
I am looking for feedback on the PEP. Of particular interest is the
specification of multidimensional indexing that I've outlined. I
think it is mostly the same as numarray (I'd love some feedback to be
sure about that), except for the fact that
On Thursday 17 February 2005 16:51, Colin J. Williams wrote:
> > I don't see the need for hierarchical type classes, though it might
> > ease the comparison with Python types.
>
> I see some small potential benefit, particularly with the addition of
> non-numeric types.
I am pushing forward for
