> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:52:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Actually, it's something of a conscious decision. Andre didn't want
>> to force the user to use AMSMath. Maybe he uses a package that
>> defines \underrightarrow that
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 21:40 +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Johannes Behr wrote:
>
> > Can I just switch on the ams package and the
> > rest of my standard latex math formulas would
> > stay the same?
>
> yes, see 3rd link below
OK, got it. Thanks again.
regards,
Johannes
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:52:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Actually, it's something of a conscious decision. Andre didn't want
> to force the user to use AMSMath. Maybe he uses a package that
> defines \underrightarrow that we don't know about.
No, I think I just forgot ams in the inset's
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:47:15PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >Johannes Behr wrote:
> >
> >>I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
> >>the math-panel inside of a display formula.
> >
> >
> >Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the
> >'
Johannes Behr wrote:
Can I just switch on the ams package and the
rest of my standard latex math formulas would
stay the same?
yes, see 3rd link below
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 14:37 +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Johannes Behr wrote:
>
> > Does the activation of the AMS math package change
> > any of my other formulas ?
>
> no.
> The amcros from amsmath are much more better than the
> default LaTeX ones.
OK. thanks.
Just to be sure:
Does the amsm
Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Johannes Behr wrote:
>>
>>>I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
>>>the math-panel inside of a display formula.
>>
>>
>> Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the
>> 'Layout->Document' dialog.
>
> this is a bu
Angus Leeming wrote:
Johannes Behr wrote:
I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
the math-panel inside of a display formula.
Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the
'Layout->Document' dialog.
this is a bug, when it is not done by LyX!
Herbert
--
http://TeXn
Johannes Behr wrote:
Does the activation of the AMS math package change
any of my other formulas ?
no.
The amcros from amsmath are much more better than the
default LaTeX ones.
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf
http://ww
Johannes Behr wrote:
> Hi Angus,
>
> thanks for the fast help
>
>> > I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
>> > the math-panel inside of a display formula.
>>
>> Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the
>> 'Layout->Document' dialog.
>>
>
> OK, works! Bu
Hi Angus,
thanks for the fast help
> > I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
> > the math-panel inside of a display formula.
>
> Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the
> 'Layout->Document' dialog.
>
OK, works! But now my document depends on the ams pac
Johannes Behr wrote:
> I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
> the math-panel inside of a display formula.
Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the
'Layout->Document' dialog.
--
Angus
Hi,
I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
the math-panel inside of a display formula.
Lyx shows the arrow correctly but latex just
stops with the following error message:
---
Undefined control sequence.
A\underrightarrow
13 matches
Mail list logo
