fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi All,
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Regards
Fred
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:17:30AM +1000, fb wrote:
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Hm. Could you try an official compiler (2.95, 3.0 or 3.1)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html, especially:
If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
contact whoever
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Andre,
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say?
--
Lgb
fb == fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fb Hi Andre, g++ --version says: 2.96
Look on the redhat site if there is an update for your gcc packages.
gcc in original rh7.0 is known to be very buggy, so you should
_really_ update to the latest they propose (of course getting gcc 3.1
is better, but
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm
Just get those packages and do rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm on them.
It's a good idea since earlier RPM versions have an optimiser bug that
make LyX crash and burn too :)
regards
john
--
Do you mean to tell me
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi All,
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Regards
Fred
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:17:30AM +1000, fb wrote:
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Hm. Could you try an official compiler (2.95, 3.0 or 3.1)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html, especially:
If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
contact whoever
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Andre,
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say?
--
Lgb
fb == fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fb Hi Andre, g++ --version says: 2.96
Look on the redhat site if there is an update for your gcc packages.
gcc in original rh7.0 is known to be very buggy, so you should
_really_ update to the latest they propose (of course getting gcc 3.1
is better, but
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm
Just get those packages and do rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm on them.
It's a good idea since earlier RPM versions have an optimiser bug that
make LyX crash and burn too :)
regards
john
--
Do you mean to tell me
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi All,
>
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
>
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
> % g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Regards
Fred
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
>
>>% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
>>
>
>What says 'g++ --version'?
>
>Andre'
>
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:17:30AM +1000, fb wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> g++ --version says: 2.96
Hm. Could you try an "official" compiler (2.95, 3.0 or 3.1)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html, especially:
If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
contact whoever
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Andre,
>
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does "rpm -qa | grep gcc" say?
--
Lgb
> "fb" == fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
fb> Hi Andre, g++ --version says: 2.96
Look on the redhat site if there is an update for your gcc packages.
gcc in original rh7.0 is known to be very buggy, so you should
_really_ update to the latest they propose (of course getting gcc 3.1
is
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
>
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
>
>
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm
>
> Just get those packages and do "rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm" on them.
It's a good idea since earlier RPM versions have an optimiser bug that
make LyX crash and burn too :)
regards
john
--
"Do you mean to
24 matches
Mail list logo
