Thanks and sorry for this stupid question.
Thank you for your help ,
Best,
Harold
2014-07-25 14:02 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Harold Mouras wrote:
> > Thank you for this help. I can see the bst file plos2009 now. However,
> if I
> > choose "Standard (numerical)", references are numbered a
Harold Mouras wrote:
> Thank you for this help. I can see the bst file plos2009 now. However, if I
> choose "Standard (numerical)", references are numbered and not by
> alphabetic order as needed by the journal. How to go through this ?
Well, the style file itself declares:
"This is a numerical c
Thank you for this help. I can see the bst file plos2009 now. However, if I
choose "Standard (numerical)", references are numbered and not by
alphabetic order as needed by the journal. How to go through this ?
Thanks,
Best,
Harold
2014-07-25 13:20 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag 25 J
Am Freitag 25 Juli 2014, 12:39:37 schrieb Harold Mouras:
> Dear Lyx Users,
> I am preparing a manuscript for Plos One using the attached bibliographic
> style. However, my LyX document does't compile when I set the bibliographic
> modules to natbib or jurabib. How can I make LyX take into account t
-- Forwarded message --
From: Harold Mouras
Date: 2014-07-25 12:26 GMT+02:00
Subject: Plos bibliographic style not taken into account
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Dear Lyx Users,
I am preparing a manuscript for Plos One using the attached bibliographic
style. However, my LyX docum
