Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a friend reminded me that if I
failed to
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a friend reminded me that if I
failed to
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a friend reminded me that if I
failed to
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
>>> time hyphenation's decrease in
12 matches
Mail list logo