Re: Lyx and latex2html: lyx->tex non-interactively?

2000-04-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Just edit your lyx file with a word processor, save it as << file.tex >> > and apply LaTeX on it. > It's a way I use when I want to make some modifications. Well, and you'll end up with something neither readable by humans nor by machines.. I think the original problem was not to simply change

Re: Lyx and latex2html: lyx->tex non-interactively?

2000-04-09 Thread Vincent VAQUIN
> > Best would be some way to convert lyx files into tex files without > > having to > > have lyx. I don't know if this is possible (that is, is there a set of > > tex > > macros somewhere that would do this?). Just edit your lyx file with a word processor, save it as << file.tex >> and apply La

Re: Lyx and latex2html: lyx->tex non-interactively?

2000-04-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
> But I can't figure > out how to get Lyx to make a tex file for latex2html to read without > actually running it in interactive mode. lyx --export latex You need a running X-Server, however... (Or a mail archive browser for retrieving other suggestions to solve your problem ;-) ) > Best w

Lyx and latex2html: lyx->tex non-interactively?

2000-04-09 Thread Ned Konz
Is there an easy way to convert lyx files into HTML using latex2html or tex4ht without using lyx, or at least without using lyx interactively? I've got source files in lyx but I want to distribute them as part of program documentation, so I want to put a conversion in my Makefile. But I can't fig