Hi,
at Thu, 14 Oct 1999 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
...
where libforms89 is not in my Linux
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
So you installed a binary package? I allready told this and will repeat
it one
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
Usually it's best to compile by yourself. You can get a Debian binary
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
...
where libforms89 is not in my Linux Distribution (Debian).
You can
Hi,
at Thu, 14 Oct 1999 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
...
where libforms89 is not in my Linux
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
So you installed a binary package? I allready told this and will repeat
it one
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
Usually it's best to compile by yourself. You can get a Debian binary
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
libforms.so.0.89 = not found
...
where libforms89 is not in my Linux Distribution (Debian).
You can
Hi,
at Thu, 14 Oct 1999 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> > I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
> > installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
> >
>
> Question :
> I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
> installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
>
Question :
I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
unavailable library :
bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
>
> Question :
> I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
> unavailable library :
>
> bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
> libforms.so.0.89 => not found
> ...
>
> where libforms89 is not in my Linux
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
>
> Question :
> I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
> unavailable library :
>
> bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
> libforms.so.0.89 => not found
So you installed a binary package? I allready told this and will repeat
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
> >
> > Question :
> > I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
> > unavailable library :
> >
> > bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
> > libforms.so.0.89 => not found
>
Usually it's best to compile by yourself. You can get a
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
> Question :
> I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
> unavailable library :
>
> bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
> libforms.so.0.89 => not found
> ...
>
> where libforms89 is not in my Linux Distribution (Debian).
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
- export as HTML
Hi Lars,
that´s great.
cu, Jens Stolze
I have tried the rpm package for 1.1.1pre2 from Sylvan and found that it
doesn't display itemize correctly. (Perhaps it doesn't allow the itemize
style.)
Good luck lyxing
Rob
Dr. Robin M. Braun
Group Head, Telecommunications Engineering
University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
- export as HTML
Other than that there are no new features compared to 1.0.4, code
cleanup is in progress and so far we have:
- migrated to useing automake in
Are there any plans soon to generalize \cite to \citet and \citep etc.
(the forms supported in natbib)? The present form is very limited
not standard for published articles in many fields (such as astrophysics!)
Thanks
Gerald Cecil
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 02:06:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
- export as HTML
Does this need tth? If it does, can you give me the pointer again
so I can
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
- export as HTML
Hi Lars,
that´s great.
cu, Jens Stolze
I have tried the rpm package for 1.1.1pre2 from Sylvan and found that it
doesn't display itemize correctly. (Perhaps it doesn't allow the itemize
style.)
Good luck lyxing
Rob
Dr. Robin M. Braun
Group Head, Telecommunications Engineering
University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
- export as HTML
Other than that there are no new features compared to 1.0.4, code
cleanup is in progress and so far we have:
- migrated to useing automake in
Are there any plans soon to generalize \cite to \citet and \citep etc.
(the forms supported in natbib)? The present form is very limited
not standard for published articles in many fields (such as astrophysics!)
Thanks
Gerald Cecil
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 02:06:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
- export as HTML
Does this need tth? If it does, can you give me the pointer again
so I can
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
> installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
>
> - export as HTML
>
Hi Lars,
that´s great.
cu, Jens Stolze
I have tried the rpm package for 1.1.1pre2 from Sylvan and found that it
doesn't display itemize correctly. (Perhaps it doesn't allow the itemize
style.)
Good luck lyxing
Rob
Dr. Robin M. Braun
Group Head, Telecommunications Engineering
University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
- export as HTML
Other than that there are no new features compared to 1.0.4, code
cleanup is in progress and so far we have:
- migrated to useing automake in
Are there any plans soon to generalize \cite to \citet and \citep etc.
(the forms supported in natbib)? The present form is very limited &
not standard for published articles in many fields (such as astrophysics!)
Thanks
Gerald Cecil
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 02:06:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have released the second prerelease for lyx-1.1.1, now most
> installation issues have been resolved and we have a new feature:
>
> - export as HTML
Does this need tth? If it does, can you give me the pointer again
so I
33 matches
Mail list logo
