Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-22 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Rob S wrote: > I've just written my entire thesis using apalike + natbib without a > problem You probably had just luck that no problem occured. Natbib and apalike a two different approaches for the same problem (even though natbib has probably been designed with apalike in mind). Jürgen

Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Matej Cepl
Janus Sandsgaard wrote: > Can anyone point me to a place that can give me an overview of (the > differences between) the styles - and help me choosing which is right for > me? I guess I simply need something apalike. As said for sociale science. I usually use just plainnat and it works pretty well

Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 21:23, Rob S wrote: > I've just written my entire thesis using apalike + natbib without a problem So far it is also working for me, but I do not dare to continue much longer. ;-) - so I changed to unsrtnat.bst. > As I mentioned some time back though I have had to add: >

Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Rob S
But as far as I understand the apalike.bst was not written with NatBiB in mind, and using it with NatBib could cause problems. This is why I started looking into abbrvnat.bst, plainnat.bst and unsrtnat.bst. But maybe I am wrong here. I've just written my entire thesis using apalike + nat

Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Sam Lewis
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:32:19 +0100 Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: > I see > > Sorry my misunderstanding - you could always chose not to use the > natbib style and just use apalike.bst See editoral note of apalike.bst: "... using an author-date style like `apalike' ..."[sic] From this I would say apalik

Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
I see Sorry my misunderstanding - you could always chose not to use the natbib style and just use apalike.bst - Original Message - From: "Janus Sandsgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:28 PM Subject: Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which

Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 19:05, Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: > Earlier you mentioned you wanted an apalike reference set up. > Select the NatBib package ffrom Layout->Document Did that already. > Then select the apalike settings when you do Insert->Lists&TOC->BibTex > Reference But as far as I understa

Re: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
CTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 5:59 PM Subject: Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me? I am using NatBib with author-year citation. On my PC I have the following styles available for NatBiB: /usr/share/texmf/bibtex/bst/natbib/abbrvnat.bst /usr/share/texmf/bibtex

Overview of the NatBib styles - which is the right one for me?

2005-06-21 Thread Janus Sandsgaard
I am using NatBib with author-year citation. On my PC I have the following styles available for NatBiB: /usr/share/texmf/bibtex/bst/natbib/abbrvnat.bst /usr/share/texmf/bibtex/bst/natbib/plainnat.bst /usr/share/texmf/bibtex/bst/natbib/unsrtnat.bst as described in the NatBib documentation (which