Dear all,
I have searched with this key (customizing natbib) on the
mailing-list archive, Dekel have suggested to use amsrefs
for easy customizeable bibliography. Could you please help
me how can I do it with LyX. I would like to write biblio-
graphy like following,
nama, year. title. journal vo
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:25:42AM, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> In fact, I wanted to stress the fact that database typing
> inside documents (which is a current practice) should be
> avoided because a bibliography tag is by definition an piece of
> data which should be written once correctly for
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Here is the point where we need a decision:
>
> + From my browsing of the amsref-doc I learned that it is even more
> complete (offers more fields and types (e.g. lectures, artwork,
> web-documents) than bibtex. Also, LaTeX markup in amsref would not be a
> m
>>Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:47:44 -0500
>>From: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Re: Re: customizing natbib
>>
>>On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:51:44AM, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
>>> The main point is to avoid
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:51:44AM, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> The main point is to avoid a dialect of bib records in amsref,
> that is to keep with the existing fields for the same
> information.
Well, now we are again in the shooting in the foot question. I
think, that it should be allowed (
>>Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:30:39 +0100 (CET)
>>From: Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Re: Re: customizing natbib
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:25:42 +0100 (MET) wrote "Jean-Pierre.Chretien"
<[EMAI
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:25:42 +0100 (MET) wrote "Jean-Pierre.Chretien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So the question is only about the choice of the standard:
> - using latex in an abstract field (which does not exists in the original
> bib data structure (which knows only about note field AFAIR) or
>>Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:08:11 +0100 (CET)
>>From: Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Re: customizing natbib
>>To: "Jean-Pierre.Chretien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:08:07 +0100 (MET) wrote &quo
>>Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:22:43 -0500
>>From: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: customizing natbib
>>
>>On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:48:54PM -0500, Paul Tremblay wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:38:09
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:48:54PM -0500, Paul Tremblay wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:38:09PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > another one is to throw bibtex out of the window and use amsrefs
> > (on www.ams.org). It does not do any such ugly things.
>
> I just checked out this website. It seem
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:38:09PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> another one is to throw bibtex out of the window and use amsrefs
> (on www.ams.org). It does not do any such ugly things.
>
I just checked out this website. It seems like the amsrefs
package is meant for publishing mathmatical do
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:38:09 -0500 wrote Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> another one is to throw bibtex out of the window and use amsrefs
> (on www.ams.org). It does not do any such ugly things.
I had a (admittedly very quick) view at the amsrefs homepage --- looks very
promising. I also read
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:03:23AM +0100, Guenter Milde wrote:
> This is the way most bibtex styles work (and I learned, it is
> the "normal" way it is done in English). As this is a problem
> with German titles (where you need to keep the Capitalization
> of Nouns) all German bibtexers know the w
> in the bibtex file *.bib
> ...
>title = {{E}ltern und {K}inder}
> ...
>
> Bibtex will leave all capitalizations in {} unchanged.
Er, I may be missing something here, but if you create a .bst file using
makebst, part of the custbib package, you are given the option of using
either
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:32:57 -0500 wrote Paul Tremblay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> When I use the natbib package, the entries in my bibliograpy are
> not in the form I need.
>
> Natbib only capitlizes the first word of the titles of articles,
This is the way most bibtex styles work (and I learned, i
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 08:12:03PM -0500, Paul Tremblay wrote:
> Thanks for this response.
>
> These different forms of /cite will change the way the
> *citations* appear. But they won't change the form the actual
> bibliograpy , will they?
To change the bibliography style, you either need to ed
Paul Tremblay wrote:
> These different forms of /cite will change the way the
> *citations* appear. But they won't change the form the actual
> bibliograpy , will they?
give an example how you like a bibliography entry. But
remember that there are tons of different bst-files
and one of them m
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 08:37:06PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> this is what natbib supports. what style do you like:
>
> Herbert
>
>
>
> %Author-year mode || Numerical mode
> % Then, \citet{key} ==>> Jones et al. (1990)|| Jones et al. [21]
> %
Paul Tremblay wrote:
> When I use the natbib package, the entries in my bibliograpy are
> not in the form I need.
>
> Natbib only capitlizes the first word of the titles of articles,
> and it does not put quotation marks around them. Also, it does
> not put parenthesis around the dates.
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
