Hi
Gerald Cecil wrote:
Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts.
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
would be generally useful.
Hi
Gerald Cecil wrote:
Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts.
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
would be generally useful.
Hi
Gerald Cecil wrote:
>
> Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts.
>
> Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} & \citet{} Bib forms
> rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
> I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
> would be generally
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Rod Pinna wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
As somebody doing a civil engineering PhD, I've found very few journals in
my field that use numerical references. Author-date is still all the rage.
I, for one, would also find this sort of thing v. useful.
The
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Gerald Finally, \maketitle still causes grief w/ what I guess are
Gerald non-standard style packages (e.g. aastex v5 from the American
Should \maketitle be placed *after* the abstract? Then, in
aastex.layout, you should insert
InTitle 1
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Rod Pinna wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
As somebody doing a civil engineering PhD, I've found very few journals in
my field that use numerical references. Author-date is still all the rage.
I, for one, would also find this sort of thing v. useful.
The
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Gerald Finally, \maketitle still causes grief w/ what I guess are
Gerald non-standard style packages (e.g. aastex v5 from the American
Should \maketitle be placed *after* the abstract? Then, in
aastex.layout, you should insert
InTitle 1
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Rod Pinna wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> As somebody doing a civil engineering PhD, I've found very few journals in
> my field that use numerical references. Author-date is still all the rage.
> I, for one, would also find this sort of thing v. useful.
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Gerald> Finally, \maketitle still causes grief w/ what I guess are
> Gerald> non-standard style packages (e.g. aastex v5 from the American
>
> Should \maketitle be placed *after* the abstract? Then, in
> aastex.layout, you should insert
>
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Jul, Gerald Cecil wrote:
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
(Fred et al. 1999)and Fred et al. (1999)
fraustrated
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
I'll admit I didn't even know they existed. You seem to be saying you use
both in the same document (!) is this true? If it is it means we'll have
to come up with something clever otherwise we could just have a flag in
the Document popup for which of
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Jul, Gerald Cecil wrote:
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
(Fred et al. 1999)and Fred et al. (1999)
fraustrated
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
I'll admit I didn't even know they existed. You seem to be saying you use
both in the same document (!) is this true? If it is it means we'll have
to come up with something clever otherwise we could just have a flag in
the Document popup for which of
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 30 Jul, Gerald Cecil wrote:
> > Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} & \citet{} Bib forms
> > rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
> > (Fred et al. 1999)and Fred et al. (1999)
>
>
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
> I'll admit I didn't even know they existed. You seem to be saying you use
> both in the same document (!) is this true? If it is it means we'll have
> to come up with something clever otherwise we could just have a flag in
> the Document popup for which
Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts.
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
would be generally useful. Recall, these forms generate
"Gerald" == Gerald Cecil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gerald Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts. Can we have an xforms checkbox
Gerald to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms rather than the
Gerald obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports? I can sort
Gerald of see where to hack the source
On 30 Jul, Gerald Cecil wrote:
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
would be generally useful. Recall, these forms generate
Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts.
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
would be generally useful. Recall, these forms generate
"Gerald" == Gerald Cecil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gerald Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts. Can we have an xforms checkbox
Gerald to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms rather than the
Gerald obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports? I can sort
Gerald of see where to hack the source
On 30 Jul, Gerald Cecil wrote:
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
would be generally useful. Recall, these forms generate
Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts.
Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} & \citet{} Bib forms
rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
would be generally useful. Recall, these forms generate
> "Gerald" == Gerald Cecil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gerald> Hello fellow LyX enthusiasts. Can we have an xforms checkbox
Gerald> to genereate \citep{} & \citet{} Bib forms rather than the
Gerald> obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports? I can sort
Gerald> of see where to hack
On 30 Jul, Gerald Cecil wrote:
> Can we have an xforms checkbox to genereate \citep{} & \citet{} Bib forms
> rather than the obsolete \cite{} that v1.0.3 currently supports?
> I can sort of see where to hack the source code, but I think this
> would be generally useful. Recall, these forms
24 matches
Mail list logo
