> On Sep 18, 2019, at 4:55 AM, list_em...@icloud.com wrote:
>
> I am using the Article class with the Roman font set to Utopia (Fourier). I
> believe that “Fourier” indicates a compatible math font, complementing Utopia.
>
> The integral signs for single and double integrals are different! I do
On 2019-09-18, list_em...@icloud.com wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> I am using the Article class with the Roman font set to Utopia
> (Fourier). I believe that “Fourier” indicates a compatible math font,
> complementing Utopia.
> The integral signs for single and
I am using the Article class with the Roman font set to Utopia (Fourier). I
believe that “Fourier” indicates a compatible math font, complementing Utopia.
The integral signs for single and double integrals are different! I don’t think
this is correct typesetting. Is there a way to fix this or is