Re: are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Paul == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul This seems to be necessary as long as you DO NOT install xforms Paul in the standard directory like /usr/X11R6. Did you read 00README? It says: If you want to install XForms in some nonstandard place, that is, other than where X stuff

Re: are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Paul == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul This seems to be necessary as long as you DO NOT install xforms Paul in the standard directory like /usr/X11R6. Did you read 00README? It says: If you want to install XForms in some nonstandard place, that is, other than where X stuff

Re: are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Paul" == Paul E Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> This seems to be necessary as long as you DO NOT install xforms Paul> in the standard directory like /usr/X11R6. Did you read 00README? It says: If you want to install XForms in some nonstandard place, that is, other than

are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-13 Thread Paul E Johnson
I'm wondering if, for LyX, the new Xforms really makes a difference. I run into some weird trouble building it. On RH 7.3 with gcc-3.0.4, I'm trying to build xforms-1.0RC5.2. The problem I run into is that the linker can't find libXext and unless I hack the Makefile like so: EXTENSIONLIB =

Re: are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-13 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:29:29PM -0600, Paul E Johnson wrote: On RH 7.3 with gcc-3.0.4, I'm trying to build xforms-1.0RC5.2. The problem I run into is that the linker can't find libXext and unless I hack the Makefile like so: EXTENSIONLIB = -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXext it is known problem

are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-13 Thread Paul E Johnson
I'm wondering if, for LyX, the new Xforms really makes a difference. I run into some weird trouble building it. On RH 7.3 with gcc-3.0.4, I'm trying to build xforms-1.0RC5.2. The problem I run into is that the linker can't find libXext and unless I hack the Makefile like so: EXTENSIONLIB =

Re: are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-13 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:29:29PM -0600, Paul E Johnson wrote: On RH 7.3 with gcc-3.0.4, I'm trying to build xforms-1.0RC5.2. The problem I run into is that the linker can't find libXext and unless I hack the Makefile like so: EXTENSIONLIB = -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXext it is known problem

are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-13 Thread Paul E Johnson
I'm wondering if, for LyX, the new Xforms really makes a difference. I run into some weird trouble building it. On RH 7.3 with gcc-3.0.4, I'm trying to build xforms-1.0RC5.2. The problem I run into is that the linker can't find libXext and unless I hack the Makefile like so: EXTENSIONLIB =

Re: are you getting a clean build of Xforms 1.0RC5.2?

2002-11-13 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:29:29PM -0600, Paul E Johnson wrote: > On RH 7.3 with gcc-3.0.4, I'm trying to build xforms-1.0RC5.2. The > problem I run into is that the linker can't find libXext and unless I > hack the Makefile like so: > > EXTENSIONLIB = -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXext it is known