"jdd" == jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jdd You are going too fast from "pre" to full version. The "stable"
jdd version is NOT stable. If one subscribe for a long time to this
jdd mailing list (as I do for now), he knows that it's not wise to
jdd use the first stable release. Better wait.
The
"jdd" == jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jdd You are going too fast from "pre" to full version. The "stable"
jdd version is NOT stable. If one subscribe for a long time to this
jdd mailing list (as I do for now), he knows that it's not wise to
jdd use the first stable release. Better wait.
The
> "jdd" == jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jdd> You are going too fast from "pre" to full version. The "stable"
jdd> version is NOT stable. If one subscribe for a long time to this
jdd> mailing list (as I do for now), he knows that it's not wise to
jdd> use the first stable release. Better
No, this is a bug that has been fixed the day after 1.1.5pre1 has been
released :( version 1.1.5pre2 should be out really soon now (should
have been on friday).
I just wondered whether it is really such a good idea to have all those
pre and fix versions around. If we use the
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre I just wondered whether it is really such a good idea to have
Andre all those pre and fix versions around. If we use the
Andre 'stable/development' distinction we'd could use the even/odd
Andre scheme as well, if we don't we could use
No, this is a bug that has been fixed the day after 1.1.5pre1 has been
released :( version 1.1.5pre2 should be out really soon now (should
have been on friday).
I just wondered whether it is really such a good idea to have all those
pre and fix versions around. If we use the
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre I just wondered whether it is really such a good idea to have
Andre all those pre and fix versions around. If we use the
Andre 'stable/development' distinction we'd could use the even/odd
Andre scheme as well, if we don't we could use
> No, this is a bug that has been fixed the day after 1.1.5pre1 has been
> released :( version 1.1.5pre2 should be out really soon now (should
> have been on friday).
I just wondered whether it is really such a good idea to have all those
pre and fix versions around. If we use the
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> I just wondered whether it is really such a good idea to have
Andre> all those pre and fix versions around. If we use the
Andre> 'stable/development' distinction we'd could use the even/odd
Andre> scheme as well, if we don't we
