Nikos Alexandris schrieb:
The image format is TIFF and the pixel distance is specified in the TIFF header.
I understand here "distance" as "resolution". Something like an image in
which the x-dimension of a pixel is 1 metre and the y-dimension of the
pixel is set to be 1.5 metre.
Exactly.
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 02:01 +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Nikos Alexandris schrieb:
>
> > I am interested in this statement...
> > Could you please extent a bit or give some pointers?
>
> This is now a bit off-topic.
Once and a while it doesn't hurt :-)
> I maintain at work a scanning electron mic
Nikos Alexandris schrieb:
I am interested in this statement...
Could you please extent a bit or give some pointers?
This is now a bit off-topic.
I maintain at work a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Due to technical reasons the distance
between the pixels in x-direction is different from t
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 22:08 +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Perhaps the distance between the pixels is different. This "feature"
> is for example possible woth
> TIFF images.
Uwe,
I am interested in this statement. I work everyday with georeferenced
rasters (where distance has a meaning, i.e. you set
Hubert Christiaen schrieb:
I am converting a scientific wikibook to a full PDF by passing over TeX and
Lyx. But some pictures suddenly show much bigger than in the wiki version.
One 600 px width image just fits on the page and another is 600 px image has
to be reduced to 60% to fit on the page
I am converting a scientific wikibook to a full PDF by passing over TeX and
Lyx. But some pictures suddenly show much bigger than in the wiki version.
One 600 px width image just fits on the page and another is 600 px image has
to be reduced to 60% to fit on the page. I find this quite strange.
