Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-14 Thread John White
Suddenly compiling lyx documents for one user produces the bizarre > >> situation that not one will compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty > >> is required. This is true even for a document with only the single > >> word "test" as contents. Other users are not

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-14 Thread Axel Dessecker
t; >> > >> situation that not one will compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty > >> is required. This is true even for a document with only the single word > >> "test" as contents. Other users are not affected. > >> > >>

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-14 Thread Dr Eberhard Lisse
that not one will  compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty >> is required.  This is true even for a document with only the single >> word "test" as contents.  Other users are not affected. >> >>     Any suggestions? >> >> Regards Frank Salter >>

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-13 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 1/13/20 11:58 AM, F M Salter wrote: Hi,     Suddenly compiling lyx documents for one user produces the bizarre situation that not one will  compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty is required.  This is true even for a document with only the single word "test" as contents.  O

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-13 Thread Axel Dessecker
Am Montag, 13. Januar 2020, 17:58:29 CET schrieb F M Salter: > Hi, > > Suddenly compiling lyx documents for one user produces the bizarre > situation that not one will compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty > is required. This is true even for a document with only

ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-13 Thread F M Salter
Hi,     Suddenly compiling lyx documents for one user produces the bizarre situation that not one will  compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty is required.  This is true even for a document with only the single word "test" as contents.  Other users are not affected.     Any s