Thanks rh. My OS is Windows 7 64bit professional.
On 13/06/2011 16:52, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/13/2011 07:01 AM, Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Dear Lyx developers,
I have noticed two problems with LyX when run from the command prompt
in windows:
1) Typing
LyX -help
or
LyX --help
displays nothing. I ca
On 06/13/2011 07:01 AM, Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
> Dear Lyx developers,
> I have noticed two problems with LyX when run from the command prompt
> in windows:
> 1) Typing
> LyX -help
> or
> LyX --help
> displays nothing. I can still use the options such as -e and so forth.
> But if I forget the switches
Dear Lyx developers,
I have noticed two problems with LyX when run from the command prompt in
windows:
1) Typing
LyX -help
or
LyX --help
displays nothing. I can still use the options such as -e and so forth.
But if I forget the switches, I have lost the help.
2) Lyx does not return/display an
I don't know this special case, but what TeX commands do you
frequently need?
Well, in my case, these are some really specific commands. For example,
as a chemist, I want the Substances in my Texts to have a number
orderered by appearance, and at the same time I want to define a short
name. S
arne12345 schrieb:
I wondered if there is a Lyx-Command to insert a specific TEX-Code
> (e.g. "\newline").
But LyX already support \newline via the Insert->Formatting menu its shortcut is Strg+Return as
described in the LyX UserGuide.
The "ert-insert"-command on
arne12345 schrieb:
Hi,
I wondered if there is a Lyx-Command to insert a specific TEX-Code (e.g. "\newline"). The
"ert-insert"-command only opens an input box, but I would like to create a toolbar for inserting
frequently used tex-codes. Can I specify an argument for "
Hi,
I wondered if there is a Lyx-Command to insert a specific TEX-Code (e.g.
"\newline"). The "ert-insert"-command only opens an input box, but I would like
to create a toolbar for inserting frequently used tex-codes. Can I specify an
argument for "ert-insert&quo
David L. Johnson wrote:
You seem to have not one, but two versions of lyx, both the xforms
interface (old and bad) and the new and better qt one.
Try entering
lyx-qt
at the command line, rather than just lyx. I presume that will work.
Then, to save your fingers, create a symbolic link from
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install lyx 1.3.7 on my Ubuntu desktop. I have installed
the following packages.
lyx_1.3.7-0.lyx.org.1_all.deb
lyx-common_1.3.7-0.lyx.org.1_all.deb
lyx-qt_1.3.7-0.lyx.org.1_i386.deb
lyx-xforms_1.3.7-0.lyx.org.1_i386.deb
I still do not see the command ly
-xforms are there.) I
am trying to make some lyx documents. BUt make is failing like this:
/bin/sh: lyx: command not found
*** Warning: not creating LaTeX docs; install lyx to rectify this
Can anyone help?
Regards
Manoj
On 10/20/05, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I don't agree. Read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html, and
> >> then get a decent email program (or news client, if you read the list
> >> via gmane). For example, I press L in kmail when I want to answer to the
> >> list.
> >
_/ On Wed 19 Oct 2005 19:42:31 BST, [Paul] wrote : \_
PS: Please always reply to the list
I second that. I noticed a tendency to reply off-list. This leaves
gaps in the mailing list archives and puts off a subset of list
subscribers. css-discuss, on the contrary, adopted some different
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | The problem is that "for" splits the returned list of files using
> > | whitespace...
> >
> > find foo -name \*.gif -print -exec convert {} `basename {}`.png \;
> > then (ha!)
>
> Thanks. I've just
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | The problem is that "for" splits the returned list of files using
> | whitespace...
>
> find foo -name \*.gif -print -exec convert {} `basename {}`.png \;
> then (ha!)
Thanks. I've just learnt something.
Don't you have to quote the args passed to convert? Bet you s
Paul Smith wrote:
>> I don't agree. Read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html, and
>> then get a decent email program (or news client, if you read the list
>> via gmane). For example, I press L in kmail when I want to answer to the
>> list.
>
> I ignored all those details (discussed at t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The problem is that "for" splits the returned list of files using
| whitespace...
find foo -name \*.gif -print -exec convert {} `basename {}`.png \;
then (ha!)
| > (and you forgot a '$')
|
| Right :) (And restricted the search to the foo directory ra
[drifting off-topic]
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> The problem is that "for" splits the returned list of files using
> whitespace...
>
> Perhaps the bigger problem is that you can overrun the internal array size
> used by "for" to store the list of returne
On 10/19/05, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree, Paul. The reply address should be occupied by the list's
> address.
>
> I don't agree. Read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html, and
> then get a decent email program (or news client, if you read the list via
> gmane). For e
Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2005 20:51 schrieb Paul Smith:
> I agree, Paul. The reply address should be occupied by the list's
address.
I don't agree. Read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html, and
then get a decent email program (or news client, if you read the list via
gmane). For exa
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming writes:
> | find foo -name '*.gif' | while read file
> | do
> | pngfile=`basename "$file" .gif`.png
> | convert "$file" "pngfile"
> | done
> Hmm... I thought thiw was usually written as a for-loop.
> for file in `find foo -name \*.gif` ; do
>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Paul wrote:
> My experience of lists is that 99% of the time I want to reply to the
> whole list, so it makes sense to me to have that as the default.
>
> > If someone really decides to make the change, please set the rewriter to put
> > both the originato
Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 10/19/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > >>> PS: Please always reply to the list
| > >
| > > I second that. I noticed a tendency to reply off-list. This leaves
| > > gaps in the mailing list archives and puts off a subset of list
| > > subscribers.
Todd Denniston wrote:
>>I agree, Paul. The reply address should be occupied by the list's address.
>
> I could agree ... if I had not seen the problems it can cause.
> example: the MUSCLE list (smart cards)
> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
>
> First: to me this breaks the rule
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| find foo -name '*.gif' | while read file
| do
| pngfile=`basename "$file" .gif`.png
| convert "$file" "pngfile"
| done
Hmm... I thought thiw was usually written as a for-loop.
for file in `find foo -name \*.gif` ; do
pngfile=`basename "
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> PS: Please always reply to the list
| >
| > I second that. I noticed a tendency to reply off-list. This leaves
| > gaps in the mailing list archives and puts off a subset of list
| > subscribers. css-discuss, on the contrary, adopted some different
| > habit
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Maybe it's just my mail client, but this list seems to default for a
> reply to the sender instead of to the list, unlike all the other lists
> I've ever been on. I accidently sent a reply intended for the list to
> the sender and didn't rea
Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On 10/19/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> PS: Please always reply to the list
> > >
> > > I second that. I noticed a tendency to reply off-list. This leaves
> > > gaps in the mailing list archives and puts off a subset of list
> > > subscribers. css-discuss, on the
On 10/19/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> PS: Please always reply to the list
> >
> > I second that. I noticed a tendency to reply off-list. This leaves
> > gaps in the mailing list archives and puts off a subset of list
> > subscribers. css-discuss, on the contrary, adopted some different
>>> PS: Please always reply to the list
>
> I second that. I noticed a tendency to reply off-list. This leaves
> gaps in the mailing list archives and puts off a subset of list
> subscribers. css-discuss, on the contrary, adopted some different
> habits. The main question to ask is "would the grou
Mike Meyer wrote:
>> 2) run, before you run pdflatex, something like
>> for FILE in `find . -name '*\.gif'`; do convert $FILE `echo $FILE |
>> sed 's/\(.*\.\)gif/\1png/'`; done
>
> basename is safer:
>
> for file in $(find . -name *.gif)
> do
> convert $file $(basename $file .gif).png
> done
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sanders, Maarten (M.J.L.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> 2) run, before you run pdflatex, something like
> for FILE in `find . -name '*\.gif'`; do convert $FILE `echo $FILE | sed
> 's/\(.*\.\)gif/\1png/'`; done
basename is safer:
for file in $(find . -name *.gif)
do
conv
aum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 8:56 AM
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: Lyx command line question
>
>
> Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
>
> > Yes it should but you must note that Export->Pdflatex is
> different to
> > Export-&
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 06:04, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> That said, I can't understand why people steer away from encapsulated
> PostScript, which in most cases ought to be used as it preserves and
> incorporates vectors rather than pixels. If used properly, it is also far
> smaller in terms of
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
> Yes it should but you must note that Export->Pdflatex is different to
> Export->latex followed by running pdflatex on the file.
>
> In the second case the only Export that Lyx is performing is Lyx->tex.
> This will not convert any graphics file formats.
This is true for 1
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Lyx command line question
Am Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2005 16:09 schrieb Sanders, Maarten (M.J.L.):
Georg/Angus,
From within the GUI things work fine. It is just the conversion on the
commandline that does not do the part w
- Original Message -
From: "Georg Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sanders, Maarten (M.J.L.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Lyx
Am Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2005 16:09 schrieb Sanders, Maarten (M.J.L.):
> Georg/Angus,
>
> From within the GUI things work fine. It is just the conversion on the
> commandline that does not do the part where the gif file is converted to
> some format pdflatex understands. Convert is present on my sy
Sanders, Maarten (M.J.L.) wrote:
> I try to use lyx from the command line.
>
> In lyx 1.4pre2 preview pdflatex goes fine.
>
> On the commandline I get:
>
> $ lyx --export latex myfile.lyx
> ... lot of messages but OK
> $ pdflatex myfile.tex
> ... goes fine except for an gif image. I can
Sanders, Maarten (M.J.L.) wrote:
> I try to use lyx from the command line.
>
> In lyx 1.4pre2 preview pdflatex goes fine.
>
> On the commandline I get:
>
> $ lyx --export latex myfile.lyx
> ... lot of messages but OK
> $ pdflatex myfile.tex
> ... goes fine except for an gif image. I can
I try to use lyx from the command line.
In lyx 1.4pre2 preview pdflatex goes fine.
On the commandline I get:
$ lyx --export latex myfile.lyx
... lot of messages but OK
$ pdflatex myfile.tex
... goes fine except for an gif image. I can the latex question
about an image not being found and
G. Milde writes:
> On 29.05.05, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On 5/20/05, G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is there a way to bind a key combination to an ERT box
> > > > containing \noindent? (I've never tried to create a key
> > > > binding to produce ERT -- that I can recall, at least.)
> > >
On 29.05.05, Paul Smith wrote:
> On 5/20/05, G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there a way to bind a key combination to an ERT box containing
> > > \noindent? (I've never tried to create a key binding to produce ERT --
> > > that I can recall, at least.)
> >
> > "command-sequence ert-i
On 5/20/05, G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a way to bind a key combination to an ERT box containing
> > \noindent? (I've never tried to create a key binding to produce ERT --
> > that I can recall, at least.)
>
> "command-sequence ert-insert; self-insert \noindent; inset-toggle;
On 19.05.05, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Is there a way to bind a key combination to an ERT box containing
> \noindent? (I've never tried to create a key binding to produce ERT --
> that I can recall, at least.)
"command-sequence ert-insert; self-insert \noindent; inset-tog
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is there a way to bind a key combination to an ERT box containing
> \noindent? (I've never tried to create a key binding to produce ERT --
> that I can recall, at least.)
Sure, I do that alot. This comes from my my.bind
\bind
les in LYXDIR.
Can anyone help?
No, 'fraid not. The lyx command in this case is too coarse for you. It
applies the entire contents of the dialog.
Angus
Is there a way to bind a key combination to an ERT box containing
\noindent? (I've never tried to create a key binding to produce ERT --
yone help?
No, 'fraid not. The lyx command in this case is too coarse for you. It
applies the entire contents of the dialog.
Angus
Hi all,
I spent some time on the train yesterday trying to set up a shortcut for
this option (the checkbox under "Layout --> Paragraph") but could not
steal-- or _find_ a name for this command in any of the keybindings or
any other files in LYXDIR.
Can anyone help?
-K
--
Kevin Pfeiffer <[EMA
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 10:38, Angus Leeming wrote:
> If I remember rightly, Ruurd provided a stripped down subset of python
> with his Win32 lyx package. Such a strategy has proved to be fragile as
> lyx2lyx's capabilities and requirements have increased with subsequent
> releases of lyx 1.3.x
Jose' Matos wrote:
>> It sounds like the installation of LyX win32 lacked some module named
>> "getopt" but I found getopt.py and getopt.pyc in
>> the e:/lyx/lyx/bin/lib/ directory.
>
> getopt belongs to the standard python library so it should be there.
>
> What version of python are you usi
On Monday 09 August 2004 12:00, He Jin wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I found a very strange problem in win32/cygwin environment using lyx
> commandline.
>
> When I try to translate a lyx file into .tex format using command line
> "lyx --export latex YYY.lyx", it reported as following:
>
>
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
He Jin wrote:
Hi everybody,
I found a very strange problem in win32/cygwin environment using lyx
commandline.
When I try to translate a lyx file into .tex format using command
line "lyx --export latex YYY.lyx", it reported as following:
*
He Jin wrote:
Hi everybody,
I found a very strange problem in win32/cygwin environment using lyx
commandline.
When I try to translate a lyx file into .tex format using command line
"lyx --export latex YYY.lyx", it reported as following:
**
Tra
Hi everybody,
I found a very strange problem in win32/cygwin environment using lyx
commandline.
When I try to translate a lyx file into .tex format using command line
"lyx --export latex YYY.lyx", it reported as following:
**
Traceback (most r
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 08:53:20PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> How do I make an ultra-simple LyX command. By that I mean something I can
> type into the minibuffer area. Like font-bold, font-code, font-default and
> the like. This is not a LaTeX command (though I spoze it woul
Hi all,
How do I make an ultra-simple LyX command. By that I mean something I can
type into the minibuffer area. Like font-bold, font-code, font-default and
the like. This is not a LaTeX command (though I spoze it would need to
interface with LaTeX commmands to be rendered correctly in
56 matches
Mail list logo
