On Tuesday 23 January 2007 3:00:18 pm Guy Hindell wrote:
> It's 2.2.3. However, happily I just tried a build of LyX 1.4.3 (I
> probably should have started with that anyhow) and that runs up OK even
> with that older python version.
Because we have fixed the particular problem between 1.4.2 and
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 1:40:34 pm Guy Hindell wrote:
I need to get lyx1.4.2 running on redhat el3 (don't ask why). Having
fetched the sources (I couldn't find an rpm ready to go) and sorted out
the dependencies (qt etc.) I went for a "configure; make" and the build
ran o
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 1:40:34 pm Guy Hindell wrote:
> I need to get lyx1.4.2 running on redhat el3 (don't ask why). Having
> fetched the sources (I couldn't find an rpm ready to go) and sorted out
> the dependencies (qt etc.) I went for a "configure; make" and the build
> ran off without a hit
I need to get lyx1.4.2 running on redhat el3 (don't ask why). Having
fetched the sources (I couldn't find an rpm ready to go) and sorted out
the dependencies (qt etc.) I went for a "configure; make" and the build
ran off without a hitch.
But...
on running up the binary something fails as LyX
