Geord, Scott and Kornel,
thanks for the infos re uninstall!
Wolfgang
On 31.05.2016 23:05, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > >>
> > >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >>
> >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22)
> >> side by side
> >
> > You're on Linux right? I'm n
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>>
>> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22)
>> side by side
>
> You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We
> don't have an uninstall target (i
On 31.05.2016 11:35, Helge Hafting wrote:
Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann:
I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22
and make
and #make install
so probably neither one
Wolfgang
Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in
this case. The rc1 lyx yo
Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann:
I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22
and make
and #make install
so probably neither one
Wolfgang
Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in this
case. The rc1 lyx you compiled is named "lyx-22", and won't inter
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:50:38, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
> >> I compiled it from source
> > With cmake or automake help?
> > In case you used cmake, you could create a debian package. Installing and
> > de-installing is easy in that case.
> >
> > Kornel
> I used ./configure --wit
On 31.05.2016 10:27, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kost
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
>
> On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote
On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16)
On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical?
Wolfgang
No the
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
>
>
> On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>
> Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical?
> Wolfgang
>
> No they're significantly different. I
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>
>
> On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical?
> > > Wolfgang
> > No they're significant
On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical?
Wolfgang
No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final
2.2.0 over rc1.
Scott
Thanks, Scott.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical?
> Wolfgang
No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final
2.2.0 over rc1.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical?
Wolfgang
17 matches
Mail list logo