Re: mathrm (not italic) in lemmas?

1999-11-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes: ?> Sure: In the following lemma (same problem with "proposition" ?> environment), there are the operators "exp" (standard macro) and ?> "dev" (own notation). Both are italicized in the PS-file. exp is certainly _not_ in italics here. dev is indeed,

Re: mathrm (not italic) in lemmas?

1999-11-08 Thread
On 08 Nov 1999 11:11:13 +010 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes: > >?> There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed >?> to be written with non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually >?> this works (by using \sin or C-m sin). Ho

Re: mathrm (not italic) in lemmas?

1999-11-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes: ?> There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed ?> to be written with non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually ?> this works (by using \sin or C-m sin). However, in the Lemma and ?> Proposition environments (which italic

mathrm (not italic) in lemmas?

1999-11-07 Thread
There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed to be written with non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually this works (by using \sin or C-m sin). However, in the Lemma and Proposition environments (which italicize text) these get italicized too. How can I turn tha