Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-24 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:55:00AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > If however your problem is only to get small and readable pdf files, a > good solution is to use the Postscript Type1 version of the computer > modern fonts. Usually you can do that by doing > > dvips -Pps myfile.dvi -o myfil

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-24 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 07:46:58PM +0100, Marcus Beyer wrote: > Isn't PDFLaTeX the _only_ reasonable solution, > when you want to include bitmap pictures, > but don't want to have huge > (Megabytes instead of Kilobytes) target files? Now, you can also use latex+dvipdfm.

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tuukka" == Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tuukka> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Marcus Beyer wrote: >> But yes! AFAIK pslatex uses "times" for math. Why is this not >> reasonable? Tuukka> I think also that it might not typeset the ps fonts as Tuukka> carefully as TeX typesets cm fonts

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-24 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Marcus Beyer wrote: > But yes! AFAIK pslatex uses "times" for math. Why is this not reasonable? For some math fonts, but not all. I think also that it might not typeset the ps fonts as carefully as TeX typesets cm fonts, but you'd better ask someone else.

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-23 Thread Marcus Beyer
> >> Why is pslatex not the "default" font type? > > Tuukka> Well, maybe it's the tradition. And some older TeX > Tuukka> installations might not have pslatex. > > The default for latex is to use computer modern font. Pslatex does not > provide reasonable math fonts But yes! AFAIK pslatex uses "

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tuukka" == Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tuukka> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Paul E Johnson wrote: >> Why is pslatex not the "default" font type? Tuukka> Well, maybe it's the tradition. And some older TeX Tuukka> installations might not have pslatex. The default for latex is to us

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-23 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Paul E Johnson wrote: > Why is pslatex not the "default" font type? Well, maybe it's the tradition. And some older TeX installations might not have pslatex.

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Paul E Johnson
Thanks all for your help. I found that changing fonts to "pslatex" created much clearer pdf output. The ability of acrobat reader to show the default fonts in pdf must depend on the system, because it was fuzzy on RedHat Linux and WinNT, but on a different win95 system it was not as bad. The pr

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Marcus Beyer
> > > > > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has > > > > > such fuzzy looking fonts? > > > > > http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn/ps707/syl01.pdf > > > > > > You're using wrong pdf viewer. Use "gv", not Acroread. > > > > I don´t want to doubt your experiences but no mat

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Rem
- Original Message - From: "Paul E Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 5:01 PM Subject: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has such >

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Stephan E. Schlierf
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2001 15:01 schrieb Tuukka Toivonen: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote: > > Am Montag, 22. Januar 2001 12:14 schrieb Tuukka Toivonen: > > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote: > > > > > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 h

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote: > Am Montag, 22. Januar 2001 12:14 schrieb Tuukka Toivonen: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote: > > > > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has such > > > > fuzzy looking fonts? > > > > http://lark.cc.ukans

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Stephan E. Schlierf
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2001 12:14 schrieb Tuukka Toivonen: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote: > > > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has such > > > fuzzy looking fonts? > > > http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn/ps707/syl01.pdf > > You're using wrong pdf v

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote: > > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has such > > fuzzy looking fonts? > > http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn/ps707/syl01.pdf You're using wrong pdf viewer. Use "gv", not Acroread. > a quick view on your file seems to

Re: trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-22 Thread Stephan E. Schlierf
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2001 09:11 schrieb Paul E Johnson: > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has such > fuzzy looking fonts? > http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn/ps707/syl01.pdf > ??? Hi Paul, a quick view on your file seems to reveal that the fonts are displayed as

trouble exporting lyx to pdf and html

2001-01-21 Thread Paul E Johnson
First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has such fuzzy looking fonts? http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn/ps707/syl01.pdf ??? Second, latex2html seems to run and it generates an html file, but it seems to call for a .css file that it does not create. I have version: latex