William F. Adams wrote:
On Thursday, August 12, 2004, at 09:36 AM, stephan beal wrote:
But if i delete it or rename it to, e.g., "foo" i get even MORE errors.
As Herbert noted, special characters which have special meanings
aren't changed by LyX when entered into an index field --- this
probabl
On Friday 13 August 2004 03:38, Fernando Perez wrote:
> stephan beal wrote:
> > Now it's time for me to go hack lyxport so it can run makeindex...
> > (lyxport-exported docs are missing the index).
...
> If you get this to work, send the mods/patch my way, and I'll put up
> a new version on the usu
Hi Stephan,
stephan beal wrote:
> Now it's time for me to go hack lyxport so it can run makeindex...
> (lyxport-exported docs are missing the index).
I saw this accidentally, I almost never read the lyx lists anymore. If you get
this to work, send the mods/patch my way, and I'll put up a new v
On Thursday, August 12, 2004, at 07:55 PM, stephan beal wrote:
Right, but by putting it into the section head, it'll then _also_
appear in the ToC, and that will appear in the index as well, which
you probably don't want, possibly also in the running head (this
depends on the documentclass and set
On Thursday 12 August 2004 16:33, William F. Adams wrote:
> If you take HV up on getting the tex file, you can then re-import it
> into LyX and have a good file which you can examine to learn how to
> enter such special characters into index fields.
That's a very good idea. Thanks :)
Regarding ID
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 21:19, Herbert Voss wrote:
> stephan beal wrote:
> > But deleting the broken IDX entry just causes MORE errors. i don't
> > get it
Just FYI, after nuking all IDX entries i've gotten it to work, and am
now happily re-indexing my document.
Now it's time for me to g
On Thursday, August 12, 2004, at 09:36 AM, stephan beal wrote:
But if i delete it or rename it to, e.g., "foo" i get even MORE errors.
As Herbert noted, special characters which have special meanings aren't
changed by LyX when entered into an index field --- this probably
qualifies as a bug, or
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 21:19, Herbert Voss wrote:
> you have a lot of errors in your code.
It's not MY code, it's LyX's code ;). i just do the typing.
i find it extremely disappointing that lyx allows me to enter invalid
entries using the Index entry dialog!!!
> - the underscore is _math_ c
stephan beal wrote:
But deleting the broken IDX entry just causes MORE errors. i don't get
it If i change the line containing the error from a Subsection to
Standard i get 28 errors. If i delete the line altogether i get 25
errors. The line currently has 2 index entries. If delete the 1st on
Hi, Lyx users!
i'm pulling my hair out... while exporting my Lyx doc i have ONE error,
something to do with an index entry. When i remove the index entry then
i suddenly get tons of COMPLETELY unrelated errors, going all the way
back to the very top of the doc. i'm damned if i do, damned if i d
10 matches
Mail list logo
