Re: [M100] BCR works!

2017-07-12 Thread Willard Goosey
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 21:14:07 + (UTC) Kurt McCullum wrote: > Willard, I have attached the 200 barcode drivers to this email. > Kurt > Thanks! Glad to see they still exist. Willard -- Willard Goosey goo...@sdc.org Socorro, New Mexico, USA I search my heart and find

Re: [M100] BCR works!

2017-07-12 Thread Willard Goosey
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 06:52:03 -0400 "Alex ..." wrote: > Write a program to, very clumsily, scan QRcodes with the old thing? No thanks. I have always left that kind of fiddly timing-dependent coding to those that *like* counting clock ticks. So, does anybody have the

Re: [M100] BCR works!

2017-07-12 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:52 AM Alex ... wrote: > Write a program to, very clumsily, scan QRcodes with the old thing? > I had a similar task at a job. Maybe 97? We were supposed to take a postal office Symbol hand scanner (1-d) and wave it up and down to scan a

Re: [M100] BCR works!

2017-07-12 Thread Alex ...
Write a program to, very clumsily, scan QRcodes with the old thing? On Jul 12, 2017 02:43, "Willard Goosey" wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:22:44 -0500 > John Gardner wrote: > > > ...now I have to resist the temptation to scan every UPC code in the > >

Re: [M100] BCR works!

2017-07-12 Thread Willard Goosey
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:22:44 -0500 John Gardner wrote: > ...now I have to resist the temptation to scan every UPC code in the > house... > > :) > Well? What else would I do with it in this era? It's not like people print URLs or whatever in 3-of-9. ;-) Willard -- Willard

Re: [M100] BCR works!

2017-07-11 Thread John Gardner
...now I have to resist the temptation to scan every UPC code in the house... :)

[M100] BCR works!

2017-07-11 Thread Willard Goosey
So I sprang for a second 1183 bar code reader wand from ebay. Also picked up the actual paper manual. They got here today, and after a little playing around, I got it to work! So then I swapped out the new wand with the old one that I thought didn't work, and it worked too! ??? I think having