Good to know!
Jan
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Gregory
McGill
Sent: maandag 28 januari 2019 18:10
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Subject: Re: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
I have ram for the 102 at arcadeshopper.com<http://arcadeshopper.com>
Greg
-(_)--ooo.---
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen
> Adolph
> *Sent:* zondag 27 januari 2019 16:55
> *To:* m...@bitchin100.com
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
>
>
>
> Classic REX does
"""""
>
> @ work( @ @ )
>
> --.ooo--(_)--ooo.---
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen
> Adolph
> *Sent:* zondag 27 januari 2019 16:55
> *To:* m...@bitchin100.com
&
"""""
@ work( @ @ )
--.ooo--(_)--ooo.---
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Stephen
Adolph
Sent: zondag 27 januari 2019 16:55
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Subject: Re: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
Classic REX does not have any R
Classic REX does not have any RAM on it, and it is plug and play meaning
there is no hardware /WR signal which is needed for RAM to work.
So, yes, a REX enabled machine with limited RAM is still a machine with
limited RAM. No shortcoming of REX there.
In fact adding REX to any machine brings all
- Original Message -
From: Brian White
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
> ...I'm not sure how bad the unreliable reset to bank 1 problem really is...
The normal practice for a reset circuit as use
I managed to modify and re-share the rex ever so slightly, in that all I
did was take an old version that wasn't pre-castellated, import into kicad,
adjust the router path to make it castellated, and since then someone else
has actually ordered and built working rexs from that. So, there is
technic
ry 25, 2019 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
Yes, I think so.
But that also means I had the concept wrong. I thought that the RAM-switching
was done ON the REX, and that the live RAM was on the REX. If I understand it
now - sorry I'm slow - the RAM-image is c
> I recall someone suggesting that sharing designs would encourage "hacking".
> I Have yet to see any shared derivatives. I recall getting a bunch of
> suggestions on how rex could be improved layout wise. I guess no one
> grabbed the baton. I would Have expected by now a new and improved d
Long winded answer to follow
Proprietary knowledge no.
Some knowledge.. sure.
So you are comfortable with the idea of building electronics but not
ordering boards? You went the hard way and succeeded!! I have a feeling
you could figure out the board stuff.
Disclaimer I no way would I sugg
> -Original Message-
>
> I have posted the design for REX at club100. I feel this design is
> pretty solid.
> I have posted the design for T200RAM at club100. This is very simple
> and good to go.
Question: if someone like myself, who has no experience with PCB design nor the
software
t: Re: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
Ram images are sized to match what is in the M100. example you cite would be
24kB of usable image data within a 32 Kb "record" on the flash...does that
answer the question ? ;)
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 2:17 PM Fred Whitaker wrote:
If it
//go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
>>> Windows 10
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* M100 on behalf of Jan
>>> Vanden Bossche
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:51:18 AM
>>> *To:* m...
gt;>
>>
>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
>> Windows 10
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* M100 on behalf of Jan Vanden
>> Bossche
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:51:18 AM
>>
t;> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
>> Windows 10
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* M100 on behalf of Jan Vanden
>> Bossche
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:51:18 AM
>> *To:* m...@bitchin100.com
>> *Su
ssche
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:51:18 AM
> *To:* m...@bitchin100.com
> *Subject:* [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
>
> If you plug in a REX in a machine that has only 24 KB of RAM, do you still
> enjoy RAM-images of 32 KB ?
>
> How does the standard
986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
> --
> *From:* M100 on behalf of Jan Vanden
> Bossche
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2019 10:51:18 AM
> *To:* m...@bitchin100.com
> *Subject:* [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
>
> If you plug in a REX in a machine that has only 24 KB of RAM
> *To:* m...@bitchin100.com
> *Subject:* [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
>
> If you plug in a REX in a machine that has only 24 KB of RAM, do you still
> enjoy RAM-images of 32 KB ?
>
> How does the standard 24 KB influece - or not - the operation of the REX ?
>
> Greetings from the TyRannoSaurus
> Jan-80
>
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Subject: [M100] REX in a sub-standard machine
If you plug in a REX in a machine that has only 24 KB of RAM, do you still
enjoy RAM-images of 32 KB ?
How does the standard 24 KB influece - or not - the operation of the REX ?
Greetings from the TyRannoSaurus
Jan-80
If you plug in a REX in a machine that has only 24 KB of RAM, do you still
enjoy RAM-images of 32 KB ?
How does the standard 24 KB influece - or not - the operation of the REX ?
Greetings from the TyRannoSaurus
Jan-80
20 matches
Mail list logo
