Re: [M100] Schematic needed

2016-05-25 Thread Mike Stein
'Normal' through-hole radial caps should fit OK; they'll be pretty small. Good luck! m - Original Message - From: "John Watson" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 6:17 PM Subject: Re: [M100] Schematic needed > My two 102s are ser nos 705300125 and 70

Re: [M100] Schematic needed

2016-05-25 Thread John Watson
t nothing around M18 > that I can see (or imagine). > > See Fig. 4-16 of the M100 Service Manual or Fig. 2-12 of the 102 Tech > reference. > > m > > - Original Message - > From: "John Watson" > To: "Model 100 Discussion" > Sent: Wedn

Re: [M100] Schematic needed

2016-05-25 Thread Mike Stein
- Original Message - From: "John Watson" To: "Model 100 Discussion" Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 12:19 PM Subject: [M100] Schematic needed >I have a model 100 and a 102. The 102 has PCB number PLX196CH1X and the > 100 is PLX120BH1X. > > I can't fi

Re: [M100] Schematic needed

2016-05-25 Thread Stephen Adolph
I was under the impression that the schematics and part numbers were identical but the layouts were different. Same for T102, M100 all variants (with some models having the modem deleted). On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:19 PM, John Watson wrote: > I have a model 100 and a 102. The 102 has PCB numb

[M100] Schematic needed

2016-05-25 Thread John Watson
I have a model 100 and a 102. The 102 has PCB number PLX196CH1X and the 100 is PLX120BH1X. I can't find any information on these boards at all. The Service Manual for the 100 and the Technical Reference Manual for the 102 show entirely different component numbers etc. I assume there are different