I finally did a side by side with my 102 and 8201 using an identical 17k text
file and testing all sorts of scrolling, searching ect. No difference at all.
Only in BASIC is there a difference due to the default integer difference.
@ work( @ @ )
--.ooo--(_)--ooo.---
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com
<mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com>] On Behalf Of Terry Stewart
Sent: zondag 11 oktober 2015 23:31
To: Model 100 Discussion
Subject: Re: [M100] Speed Quest
.ooo--(_)--ooo.---
>
>
> From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Terry
> Stewart
> Sent: zondag 11 oktober 2015 23:31
> To: Model 100 Discussion
> Subject: Re: [M100] Speed Question
>
> I know that, in default, the BASIC is way faster. The NEC
rus
Jan-80 """""
@ work( @ @ )
--.ooo--(_)--ooo.---
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Terry Stewart
Sent: zondag 11 oktober 2015 23:31
To: Model 100 Discussion
Subject: Re: [M100] Speed Question
I know that,
I know that, in default, the BASIC is way faster. The NEC 8201 defaults to
single precision in BASIC whereas the Model 100 does it all in double
precision unless told otherwise.
Terry (Tez)
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Josh Malone wrote:
> Didn't the 8201 use a different LCD controller?
>
Didn't the 8201 use a different LCD controller?
On Oct 9, 2015 4:47 PM, "Kurt McCullum" wrote:
> I acquired an NEC8201 a couple weeks back and I've been doing some
> comparisons (as well as updating mComm to work better with it). Is it just
> me or is the 8201 faster than the 102 and 200? I seem
I acquired an NEC8201 a couple weeks back and I've been doing some comparisons
(as well as updating mComm to work better with it). Is it just me or is the
8201 faster than the 102 and 200? I seem to notice it most with screen
refreshes.
Kurt
