It's between 10 and 11 seconds on my M100.
--
Miles
-Original Message-
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:32 PM
To: Model 100 Discussion
Subject: Re: [M100] VirtualT 1.7 Speed
I wonder how long that would take
I thought there might have been a change.
An option would be nice, but no hurry.
--
Miles
-Original Message-
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:31 PM
To: Model 100 Discussion
Subject: Re: [M100] VirtualT 1.7 Speed
Oh
just ran the following code it twice on my 200
10 PRINT TIME$
20 FOR I=0TO239:LINE(I,0)-(I,63):NEXT
30 PRINT TIME$
First time 10 seconds the second time 11 seconds.
On 4/23/2015 7:43 PM, Bert Put wrote:
Just under 11 seconds (on a 102)
Cheers,Bert
On Apr 23, 2015, at 21:32, Gmail wrot
Ahh. Yeah, I didn't spend a whole lot of time fine tuning it. It is easy to
disable and re-release.
Ken
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Bert Put wrote:
>
> Just under 11 seconds (on a 102)
>
> Cheers,Bert
>
>> On Apr 23, 2015, at 21:32, Gmail wrote:
>>
>> I wonder
Just under 11 seconds (on a 102)
Cheers,Bert
On Apr 23, 2015, at 21:32, Gmail wrote:
> I wonder how long that would take on a real M100.
>
> Ken
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Miles Willmek wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone else noticed that v1.7 is significantly slo
I wonder how long that would take on a real M100.
Ken
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Miles Willmek wrote:
>
> Has anyone else noticed that v1.7 is significantly slower?
>
> For instance in T102 mode w/ 2.4MHz selected the following program takes
> about 9 seconds to run
Oh yeah, I forgot about that. In 2.4Mhz mode I was trying to emulate the
hardware timing more closely and added "LCD access" delays similar to what the
real M100/M102 see. I guess I should have made it a selectable feature.
Ken
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Miles Willme
I have noticed it. I just adjusted the speed higher. The 200 emulation
doesn't seem to have as much delay but definitely the 100/102.
Kurt
On 4/23/2015 6:08 PM, Miles Willmek wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that v1.7 is significantly slower?
For instance in T102 mode w/ 2.4MHz selected the fol
Has anyone else noticed that v1.7 is significantly slower?
For instance in T102 mode w/ 2.4MHz selected the following program takes about
9 seconds to run in v1.6 and 26 seconds in v1.7.
10 FOR I=0TO239:LINE(I,0)-(I,63):NEXT
I am curious if this is a bug.
--
Miles Willmek
