Hi Matt,
I'm a little confused... shouldn't it behave differently when you change the
value of an important constant? :-)
I'm not too surprised that there are some hard-coded 31s in the Alpha ISA
definition; those should be converted to say ZeroReg if that's what they are
representing.
I guess i
I am progressing with my ISA implementation. As mentioned before I am
porting the Alpha ISA to use our in house ISA.
Interestingly, today when I tried to change the ZeroReg definition (reg 31
in alpha) to reg 0, I get different output from a trace run of the first
few instructions of my program (a
