I have a real engineering question. In real life, is the redundant path
actually used?
If I owned a system that had a redundant path, I would place an alarm on
the backup path and treat its use as a system failure. Maybe we finish the
current operation while in alarm state but this is not the n
> On 9 Jun 2020, at 23:51, Stephen Bell wrote:
>
>
> The BBB would be the master for my use case, with devices such as servomotor
> drivers as slaves in a dual-redundant topology. I use the BBB Wireless, and
> thus don't have the onboard RJ-45.
If you want the bus to be redundant, the mas
Hello,
Sorry if I came out rude, that was not my intention.
As for BBB and EtherCat, if you use the ”standard” one with a LAN port you
dont need a cape at all, assuming that you would be able to sacrifice the
ring topology. Running it headless and using a usb wlan, you would be able
to keep the “
