No, I think the idea was to inform machinekit users of a possible problem
with the autoconf settings and details of the changes required to get
machinekit to build from the git repo.
Raspbian is a testbench for compiling ARM code for a number of test SOC and
SBC.
I probably should not have
I think I may not, it would probably be a large waste of time.
On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 6:57:10 AM UTC+1, Timothy March wrote:
>
> You may want to look at post from RPI gipo help and try LinuxCnc with
> hal_gipo.so by KL Chin
>
> “Quote
> Hi ,
>
> I still testing both.
>
> 1) LinuxCNC
As the Raspbian Buster image was released (we use as ARM benchmark test
distro) there was a few SOC test compiles made overnight and the scripts
failed with errors due to omission of libatomic in the git sources.
Seems line 367 and 33 of Submakefile in rtapi and hal/utils needs the
addition.
>
>
Congratulations, machinekit is most excellent work, I don't know how the
developers find time to keep the project going, and give my thanks to
everyone for their efforts and contributions.
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github:
Have you tried asking a question on the raspberrypi.org forum in the
linuxcnc thread?
I think the jessie install will definite not work on stretch, there were a
few knowledgable people at rpi forum that may be able to help you if you
ask, I think kinsa was the username of the guy that did the
It is awesome work, but I have one problem with it, it requires Qt and most
linuxcnc/machinkit gui used to be based around gtk/glade?
I have never found it easy enough to get Qt dev environment setup, so I
have never used Qt.
Work was done on gladetohtml with threedjs/ws backplot, I am trying
my request to the board designers or linux
developers at asus.
I wonder what will happen?
On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 10:34:21 PM UTC, mung kie wrote:
>
>
> I am probably going into too much detail here, but I recently got a
> purpose designed boxford tcl cnc lathe from ebay f
