In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Dubois) wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release of the Perl Dev Kit 7.0 Beta 2.
http://www.activestate.com/products/perl_dev_kit/beta.plex
...
seems attractive but :
System Requirements
* Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger or later
*
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:06:10 +0100, kurtz le pirate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Dubois) wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release of the Perl Dev Kit 7.0 Beta 2.
http://www.activestate.com/products/perl_dev_kit/beta.plex
seems attractive
On 2 feb 2007, at 19.06, kurtz le pirate wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Dubois) wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release of the Perl Dev Kit 7.0 Beta 2.
http://www.activestate.com/products/perl_dev_kit/beta.plex
...
seems attractive but :
System
quoth Jan Dubois:
quoth kurtz le pirate:
quoth Jan Dubois:
I'm happy to announce the release of the Perl
Dev
Kit 7.0 Beta 2.
http://www.activestate.com/products/perl_dev_kit/beta.plex
seems attractive but :
System Requirements
[...]
* ActivePerl build 816 or later --
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:01:19 -0800 (PST), wren ng thornton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I had to guess, the objection may be to requiring
ActivePerl itself, not in opposition to Apple's Perl
specifically, but in opposition to any other Perl. A
number of people on this list have traditional