Re: Package distro for 5.6.1 or 5.8?

2002-11-01 Thread Ken Williams
[Just getting back to this thread after an overseas vacation...] On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 02:53 AM, Nathan Torkington wrote: I'm seeing a strange coredump from the test suite of XML::Writer with the stock Perl 5.6.0 on Jag. Strange because this is a pure Perl module. I figure the answer

Re: Package distro for 5.6.1 or 5.8?

2002-10-18 Thread Michael Maibaum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 10:17 AM, Sherm Pendley wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 12:53 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote: I remember reading that Ken was working on a simple installer distro for newer Perls. Did that ever go anywhere?

Re: Package distro for 5.6.1 or 5.8?

2002-10-18 Thread Sherm Pendley
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 12:53 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote: I remember reading that Ken was working on a simple installer distro for newer Perls. Did that ever go anywhere? I've been thinking of building a 5.8.0 installer package that includes a copy of CamelBones. I'd configure it t

Re: Package distro for 5.6.1 or 5.8?

2002-10-18 Thread Michael Maibaum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 12:40 PM, Sherm Pendley wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 01:57 PM, Michael Maibaum wrote: I would, but be aware the darwinports goes into /opt/local by default. Mine is not the only distribution that wou

Re: Package distro for 5.6.1 or 5.8?

2002-10-18 Thread Sherm Pendley
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 01:57 PM, Michael Maibaum wrote: I would, but be aware the darwinports goes into /opt/local by default. Mine is not the only distribution that would clash with it, then. Many of the Server Logistics packages are also installed into /opt. It's the traditional