Re: What does 10.0.1 updater do?

2001-04-16 Thread Scott Anguish
On Monday, April 16, 2001, at 12:39 PM, Chris Nandor wrote: > At 06:56 -0600 2001.04.16, Bob Dalgleish wrote: >> By practice, /System/Library/Perl belongs to the distributor, and >> /Library/Perl belongs to you. >> >> The exceptions would be if you install a "standard" Perl module - this >> has

Re: What does 10.0.1 updater do?

2001-04-16 Thread Chris Nandor
At 06:56 -0600 2001.04.16, Bob Dalgleish wrote: >By practice, /System/Library/Perl belongs to the distributor, and >/Library/Perl belongs to you. > >The exceptions would be if you install a "standard" Perl module - this has >to go into /System/Library/Perl/... so that it is always found. Similarly

Re: What does 10.0.1 updater do?

2001-04-16 Thread Bob Dalgleish
on 4/15/01 8:39 PM, Ken Williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed after I ran the 10.0.1 updater that the timestamp on /usr/bin/perl > had changed to the time I updated. I'm not sure whether anything actually > changed or not, since it's still Perl 5.6.0. > > 1) Anyone know whet

What does 10.0.1 updater do?

2001-04-15 Thread Ken Williams
Hi, I noticed after I ran the 10.0.1 updater that the timestamp on /usr/bin/perl had changed to the time I updated. I'm not sure whether anything actually changed or not, since it's still Perl 5.6.0. 1) Anyone know whether the updater actually changed perl? 2) If I add new modules in /Library/