On Monday, April 16, 2001, at 12:39 PM, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 06:56 -0600 2001.04.16, Bob Dalgleish wrote:
>> By practice, /System/Library/Perl belongs to the distributor, and
>> /Library/Perl belongs to you.
>>
>> The exceptions would be if you install a "standard" Perl module - this
>> has
At 06:56 -0600 2001.04.16, Bob Dalgleish wrote:
>By practice, /System/Library/Perl belongs to the distributor, and
>/Library/Perl belongs to you.
>
>The exceptions would be if you install a "standard" Perl module - this has
>to go into /System/Library/Perl/... so that it is always found. Similarly
on 4/15/01 8:39 PM, Ken Williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed after I ran the 10.0.1 updater that the timestamp on /usr/bin/perl
> had changed to the time I updated. I'm not sure whether anything actually
> changed or not, since it's still Perl 5.6.0.
>
> 1) Anyone know whet
Hi,
I noticed after I ran the 10.0.1 updater that the timestamp on /usr/bin/perl
had changed to the time I updated. I'm not sure whether anything actually
changed or not, since it's still Perl 5.6.0.
1) Anyone know whether the updater actually changed perl?
2) If I add new modules in /Library/