Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-06 Thread Jonathan Baumgartner
On 2/5/02 2:47 PM, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before trying the reinstall, you could try just deleting any .ph files you find in /Library/Perl/ . I don't have any .ph files in my /Library/Perl/ tree. Tried that. I actually deleted the entire contents of /Library/Perl as well as

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-05 Thread Jonathan Baumgartner
On 2/4/02 11:29 PM, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've never in all my years of Perl programming (and installing) ever had to run h2ph manually. I was under the impression that one never needed to run it anymore, but maybe I've just never been in that situation. I read something

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-05 Thread Jonathan Baumgartner
On 2/5/02 2:25 PM, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you didn't issue any h2ph commands? Sorry; yeah, I did. I did this: % cd /usr/include; h2ph * sys/* You could download a fresh copy of perl 5.6 and install it, or take this opportunity to upgrade to 5.6.1. I don't know of any way

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-05 Thread Ken Williams
On Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 01:37 PM, Jonathan Baumgartner wrote: On 2/5/02 2:25 PM, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you didn't issue any h2ph commands? Sorry; yeah, I did. I did this: % cd /usr/include; h2ph * sys/* You could download a fresh copy of perl 5.6 and install

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-05 Thread Jonathan Baumgartner
On 2/5/02 5:16 PM, Charles Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Careful, there, Jon. I've got a whole shelf here of manuals that Randal wrote. (Granted, most of them are now obsolete, but still, there they are.) That's what the smiley was for! (Honestly, no disrespect intended.) I suppose I

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-05 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Jonathan == Jonathan Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jonathan I read something that said it was a good idea. Of course now I can't Jonathan remember where I read that. It was a great idea for Perl3. We're now about a decade past that. :) Anything that still says require sys/socket.ph

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-05 Thread Jonathan Baumgartner
On 2/5/02 5:03 PM, Randal L. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was a great idea for Perl3. We're now about a decade past that. :) D'oh. Well, although I've programmed for Perl in the past, I've never done much installing. So much for manuals .. :) thanks, jon

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-04 Thread Ken Williams
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 02:41 AM, Jonathan Baumgartner wrote: I am trying to get demime working on OS X with majordomo. It required some packages that I grabbed CPAN without any problems. I _think_ I'm running Perl 5.6.0, but I'm not sure because CPAN kept trying to upgrade to

Re: h2ph problems

2002-02-04 Thread Ken Williams
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 09:47 PM, Jonathan Baumgartner wrote: On 2/4/02 6:39 PM, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unless (defined (/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib)) { sub /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib() { 1 } } What command created _h2ph_pre.ph? It's flawed - it's trying to look