On Aug 9, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
For what it's worth, I have much the same issues with Firefox. Steady
growth and increase in memory usage that only goes away with a
restart. And no, 4 GB is plenty. I remember when Mac OS ran in 8 MB on
a 68040 and still
On Aug 10, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Jared Earle wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jonathon Kuo
newsli...@autonomy.caltech.edu wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
4 GB is plenty of memory. You should not need that much.
How rude... the new Safari was
On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
On Aug 10, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Jared Earle wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jonathon Kuo
newsli...@autonomy.caltech.edu wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
4 GB is plenty of memory. You should
On 10-Aug-2010, at 12:58, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
3. I'm using fixed size, collapsible swapfiles. I found that
adjustable sized swapfiles pretty much never clean up (seems to only
clean down to the high-water mark, and never collapse down to reuse
discarded pages.) This works
On Aug 10, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Neil Laubenthal wrote:
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:05 PM, Daniel Israel wrote:
... and there's NO END of companies who have standardized on IE6 and won't
upgrade.
Not to mention the government in the UK.
I have a banking client in the UK. IE6 ONLY. Never
