Re: intltool maintainer is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-01-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 22, 2007, at 14:42, Marc André Selig wrote: On 22.01.2007, at 21:27, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Ok. Is there a good way to discover all ports that list macports- [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a maintainer? Then I could change them all at once. If there isn't a better way, I could always use a find

Re: Ticket #11248 commit

2007-01-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 18, 2007, at 10:16, Cedric Luthi wrote: On 17 janv. 07, at 21:16, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:18, Cédric Luthi wrote: Please someone with commit access, take care of this ticket ;-) http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/11248 This will be needed for a port

Re: Can't install libsdl-mixer_fr .. evil inflexible ticketing systems!

2007-01-22 Thread Mark Duling
Salvatore Domenick Desiano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Saturday, January 20, 2007 at 12:42 PM -0800 wrote: >SDL is a tricky library because it ties to many, many other libraries, >which makes it more likely to break under different system >configurations than other ports. This isn't an excuse, but an

Re: intltool maintainer is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-01-22 Thread Marc André Selig
On 22.01.2007, at 21:27, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Ok. Is there a good way to discover all ports that list macports- [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a maintainer? Then I could change them all at once. If there isn't a better way, I could always use a find expression and locate all Portfiles and then grep the

Re: Can any perl gurus answer this? - SpeedyCGI

2007-01-22 Thread Mark Duling
No, I didn't ever find the answer and it bugs the heck out of me. Normally, I Google up information or FreeBSD, OpenBSD, or Portage patches or somebody's manual install notes to fix problems like that. Not for this one and the mailing list looks dead, -although I didn't try to emailing the author

Re: intltool maintainer is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-01-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 22, 2007, at 04:32, Randall Wood wrote: On 22 Jan 2007, at 00:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: What does it mean when a port's maintainer is macports- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The intltool port for example. Should that be changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes. That should be changed. A whole slew of por

Re: bzip2 upgrade from 1.0.3 -> 1.0.4

2007-01-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:33, Sbranzo wrote: On 22/01/07 06:09, Randall Wood wrote: rhwood$ sudo port upgrade outdated ---> Deactivating bzip2 1.0.3_0 ---> Fetching bzip2 ---> Attempting to fetch bzip2-1.0.4.tar.gz from http:// www.bzip.org/ 1.0.4/ ---> Verifying checksum(s) for bzip2 --->

rubygems update

2007-01-22 Thread Paul M. Lambert
I've opened a ticket with a patch to the rb-rubygems Portfile This patch updates it to 0.9.1. The current (0.9.0) and previous versions are being deprecated due to a security issue, and will stop working (for remote repository access) soon. https://svn.macosforge.org/projects/macports/tick

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-22 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Let me see what can be done to fix this... On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:12 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: --On 19 January 2007 12:47:43 -0800 "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Cédric Luthi wrote: Other than that, the port seems OK, but I don't have commit righ

Re: bzip2 upgrade from 1.0.3 -> 1.0.4

2007-01-22 Thread Sbranzo
On 22/01/07 06:09, Randall Wood wrote: > rhwood$ sudo port upgrade outdated > ---> Deactivating bzip2 1.0.3_0 > ---> Fetching bzip2 > ---> Attempting to fetch bzip2-1.0.4.tar.gz from http://www.bzip.org/ > 1.0.4/ > ---> Verifying checksum(s) for bzip2 > ---> Extracting bzip2 > ---> Applying

bzip2 upgrade from 1.0.3 -> 1.0.4

2007-01-22 Thread Randall Wood
rhwood$ sudo port upgrade outdated ---> Deactivating bzip2 1.0.3_0 ---> Fetching bzip2 ---> Attempting to fetch bzip2-1.0.4.tar.gz from http://www.bzip.org/ 1.0.4/ ---> Verifying checksum(s) for bzip2 ---> Extracting bzip2 ---> Applying patches to bzip2 Error: Target com.apple.patch return

Re: Naming of postgresql & related

2007-01-22 Thread Randall Wood
On 21 Jan 2007, at 20:57, John Ridgway wrote: On Jan 20, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Salvatore Domenick Desiano wrote: Incidentally, I only think this should be used for specific ports where more than one major version is constantly in active use (apache, mysql, postgresql come to mind). In other

Re: intltool maintainer is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-01-22 Thread Randall Wood
On 22 Jan 2007, at 00:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: What does it mean when a port's maintainer is macports- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The intltool port for example. Should that be changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes. That should be changed. A whole slew of ports got maintainers changes from [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-22 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 19 January 2007 12:47:43 -0800 "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Cédric Luthi wrote: Other than that, the port seems OK, but I don't have commit rights. Would you like some? We can always use people who are motivated enough to go through