Re: Perl still at 5.8.8?

Ah, thanks for the clarification. I'm not an active Perl user, so that little bit of lore wasn't known to me. - Jordan On Feb 22, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I notice we're still at Perl version 5.8.8 which is over a year old. Are we sticking at this v

Re: Perl still at 5.8.8?

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I notice we're still at Perl version 5.8.8 which is over a year old. Are we sticking at this version for a reason, or is perl 5.9.4 in the cards? The even numbers are in development versions. At some point, 5.9.x will become 5.10. Regards, Blair -- Blair Zajac,

Perl still at 5.8.8?

I notice we're still at Perl version 5.8.8 which is over a year old. Are we sticking at this version for a reason, or is perl 5.9.4 in the cards? - Jordan ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org

Re: Python 2.4 vs Python 2.5 and System vs MacPorts python

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: This has been an interesting conversation, particularly given some of the comments from folks claiming they're facing this scenario in commercial / support scenarios where products are based on (presumably forwards incompatible) Python version x and unable to migrate to

Re: Python 2.5 and py-crypto...

Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: On 22.2.2007, at 5.07, Blair Zajac wrote: Randall Wood wrote: On 21 Feb 2007, at 20:43, Landon Fuller wrote: On Feb 21, 2007, at 15:43, Weissmann Markus wrote: Hi Douglas, the soon-to-be-released version 1.4 of port will come with a python 2.5 "port group". This w

Python 2.4 vs Python 2.5 and System vs MacPorts python

This has been an interesting conversation, particularly given some of the comments from folks claiming they're facing this scenario in commercial / support scenarios where products are based on (presumably forwards incompatible) Python version x and unable to migrate to Python version y.

Re: Python 2.5 and py-crypto...

On 22.02.2007, at 18:35, Landon Fuller wrote: On Feb 22, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Weissmann Markus wrote: On 22.02.2007, at 03:54, Randall Wood wrote: On 21 Feb 2007, at 20:43, Landon Fuller wrote: On Feb 21, 2007, at 15:43, Weissmann Markus wrote: Hi Douglas, the soon-to-be-released version 1

Re: [22092] trunk/dports/python

Yves de Champlain wrote: Le 07-02-22 à 11:05, Blair Zajac a écrit : Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: On 18.2.2007, at 19.39, Markus Weissmann wrote: skip ... Well, I beg to differ once again (though I am not sure it makes any difference). The ports with no version number should always be for the

Re: Python 2.5 and py-crypto...

On Feb 22, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Weissmann Markus wrote: On 22.02.2007, at 03:54, Randall Wood wrote: On 21 Feb 2007, at 20:43, Landon Fuller wrote: On Feb 21, 2007, at 15:43, Weissmann Markus wrote: Hi Douglas, the soon-to-be-released version 1.4 of port will come with a python 2.5 "port

Re: [22092] trunk/dports/python

Le 07-02-22 à 11:05, Blair Zajac a écrit : Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: On 18.2.2007, at 19.39, Markus Weissmann wrote: skip ... Well, I beg to differ once again (though I am not sure it makes any difference). The ports with no version number should always be for the latest versions. If por

Re: some ports

* dpkt fails to configure ("use_configure no" fixes the problem) Thanks for the feedback. * even then dpkt doesn't stage to destroot correctly: http:// paste.lisp.org/display/37221 I'm still not very clear regarding the destroot stuff when writing those. Guess I should use destroot inst

Re: [22092] trunk/dports/python

Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: On 18.2.2007, at 19.39, Markus Weissmann wrote: On 18.02.2007, at 17:47, Yves de Champlain wrote: Le 07-02-17 à 14:15, Blair Zajac a écrit : Yves de Champlain wrote: Le 07-02-17 à 11:32, Yves de Champlain a écrit : Le 07-02-17 à 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: some ports

Hello, comments on those portfiles: * dpkt fails to configure ("use_configure no" fixes the problem) * even then dpkt doesn't stage to destroot correctly: http:// paste.lisp.org/display/37221 * problem with that: only the destroot should be modified in the destroot phase, not the ac

some ports

Hi all, My first attempts: http://mel.icious.net/macosx/ports/net/ dpkt - Python packet creation/parsing library fl0p - Passive L7 flow fingerprinter nbtscan - NetBIOS scanner nikto - Web server vulnerability scanner nmbscan - SMB/NetBIOS shares scanner Regards, --mel

Re: [22092] trunk/dports/python

On 20.02.2007, at 11:44, Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: On 18.2.2007, at 19.39, Markus Weissmann wrote: On 18.02.2007, at 17:47, Yves de Champlain wrote: Le 07-02-17 à 14:15, Blair Zajac a écrit : Yves de Champlain wrote: Le 07-02-17 à 11:32, Yves de Champlain a écrit : Le 07-02-17 à 11:18, [EM

Re: Python 2.5 and py-crypto...

On Feb 22, 2007, at 6:15 AM, Weissmann Markus wrote: The problem I see here is, that there is code that runs with 2.5 but not with 2.4 (and vice versa). Therefore we would at least need a mechanism for also allowing the "cheap" duplicate ports (for 2.4 and 2.5) as there will be modules that

Re: Python 2.5 and py-crypto...

On 22.02.2007, at 03:54, Randall Wood wrote: On 21 Feb 2007, at 20:43, Landon Fuller wrote: On Feb 21, 2007, at 15:43, Weissmann Markus wrote: Hi Douglas, the soon-to-be-released version 1.4 of port will come with a python 2.5 "port group". This will allow us to quickly produce all the