On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:10 PM, Elias Pipping wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-03-03 19:44:32 -0800, Reid Nichol wrote:
[...]
Now, as for the messing up the Portfile thing. Yes, everyone
agrees
that having the universal binary hack in every Portfile is mess
On Mar 4, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
- t(ar|bz|gz) {
+ t(ar|bz|bz2|gz) {
"t(ar|bz|gz)" matches both "tbz" & "tbz2" in the regexp, so that one
change there wouldn't be necessary. But you get my point ;-)
-jmpp
___
macports-d
On Feb 28, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
I was messing around with the portarchivetype option today and tried
to set it to tbz2 according to ports.conf, but the resulting files,
while ending in .tbz2, were not:
/opt/local/var/db/dports/packages/darwin/i386/coreutils
-6.7_1+with_def
On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-03-03 19:44:32 -0800, Reid Nichol wrote:
[...]
Now, as for the messing up the Portfile thing. Yes, everyone
agrees
that having the universal binary hack in every Portfile is messy and
undesirable. Please, stop bringing this up as
On 2007-03-03 19:44:32 -0800, Reid Nichol wrote:
[...]
> Now, as for the messing up the Portfile thing. Yes, everyone agrees
> that having the universal binary hack in every Portfile is messy and
> undesirable. Please, stop bringing this up as it really is beating a
> dead horse at this point.
