Re: Deactivating a port

2007-03-21 Thread Paul Guyot
On Mar 22, 2007, at 1:13 PM, John Ridgway wrote: Friends - I'm creating some new ports -- stuff from CTAN for TeX, and I am discovering a real need for a pre- or post- deactivate hook (preferably both, but I could live with only post-). What are the chances that this functionality could

Deactivating a port

2007-03-21 Thread John Ridgway
Friends - I'm creating some new ports -- stuff from CTAN for TeX, and I am discovering a real need for a pre- or post- deactivate hook (preferably both, but I could live with only post-). What are the chances that this functionality could get in to the base? The reason is that when addin

Re: fftw3

2007-03-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:01, Takeshi Enomoto wrote: I submitted a portfile for fftw-3.1.2. fftw-2 and fftw-3 are incompatible so port fftw should remain as it is. Port fftw-3 already exists. See further notes in the ticket. Thanks

port install various gcc - XCode effects?

2007-03-21 Thread Michael Brian Bentley
I expect that the answer is no, but I'm asking anyway just in case. Apple has their version 3.3, 4.0.1 and later builds of gcc. If I install gcc 3.4.6 and gcc 4.1.1 (not 4.1.2?) using MacPorts, will doing so confuse XCode or XCode-based project builds? Thanks, -Mike _

Re: Mutt-devel

2007-03-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 21, 2007, at 13:46, Sbranzo wrote: On 18/03/07 13:55, Sbranzo wrote: A new version of mutt-devel is available: http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/11553 I received no response so far from the maintainer, can someone commit the (trivial) patch? ping :-) Oop! Sorry. Loo

Re: Mutt-devel

2007-03-21 Thread Elias Pipping
committed in r23005. http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/changeset/23005 Regards, Elias Pipping On Mar 21, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Sbranzo wrote: On 18/03/07 13:55, Sbranzo wrote: A new version of mutt-devel is available: http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/11553 I receiv

Re: Mutt-devel

2007-03-21 Thread Sbranzo
On 18/03/07 13:55, Sbranzo wrote: > A new version of mutt-devel is available: > http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/11553 > > I received no response so far from the maintainer, can someone commit > the (trivial) patch? ping :-) Gufo ___

patch for #10571

2007-03-21 Thread Kirk Kelsey
I've posted a patch to ticket #10571 that I think resolves it and just want to make sure it lands on a commiter's radar. Let me know if there's a more official way to do so (its an unassigned ticket). Kirk ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev

Re: cairo-devel is ancient/broken

2007-03-21 Thread Elias Pipping
On Mar 21, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Mark Duling wrote: Sounds like we have a consensus for nuking. I'd say go ahead if you want to. If there are reasons down the road to have them, they can be recreated at revision levels that actually work. Better than having broken ports that confuse people. Mar

Re: cairo-devel is ancient/broken

2007-03-21 Thread Mark Duling
Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 12:12 AM -0800 wrote: >I'd say nuke it, along with pango-devel and glib2-devel. Should I do >it? Sigh... I forget again: is there an easy way to tell if any ports >depend on those? > >Unless... I mean, we could certainly update th

Re: [22998] trunk/dports/lang

2007-03-21 Thread Randall Wood
You may wish to recreate a iovm port along the lines the last revision of the abiword2 port (http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/browser/trunk/dports/gnome/abiword2/Portfile?rev=19081) where the port was revised to replace itself when upgraded with the new port. This would allow us to im

Re: cairo-devel is ancient/broken

2007-03-21 Thread Elias Pipping
On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 20, 2007, at 23:25, Mark Duling wrote: cairo-devel is ancient, broken, and looks unnceccesary now. The tarball is fetched from ~/pkern. Can it be deleted? I'd say nuke it, along with pango-devel and glib2-devel. Should I do it? S

EOG (Eye of GNOME) works!

2007-03-21 Thread Randall Wood
ALCON: EOG (Eye of GNOME) version 2.18.0.1 has been committed to the ports tree and should be available later today. More importantly, it works! (By works, I mean that it does not crash at startup and seems to otherwise behave as it seems it should behave). I figured out what was wrong wh

Re: cairo-devel is ancient/broken

2007-03-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 20, 2007, at 23:25, Mark Duling wrote: cairo-devel is ancient, broken, and looks unnceccesary now. The tarball is fetched from ~/pkern. Can it be deleted? I'd say nuke it, along with pango-devel and glib2-devel. Should I do it? Sigh... I forget again: is there an easy way to tell