Re: Variants consistency

2007-04-23 Thread N_Ox
Le 24 avr. 07 à 07:39, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : On Apr 23, 2007, at 13:21, N_Ox wrote: Why not an equivalent of the use.desc file of Gentoo's Portage package manager which would provide some kind of global variants? I'm not familiar with how Gentoo handles this. Could you tell us? Gentoo

Re: Variants consistency

2007-04-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 23, 2007, at 13:21, N_Ox wrote: Variants' names should be consistent, I don't think it's the case now: for example, libsdl-framework has a nostatic variant, whereas the expat's one is named no_static. It would be nice to have some kind of naming guidelines for this kind of things.

Variants consistency

2007-04-23 Thread N_Ox
Variants' names should be consistent, I don't think it's the case now: for example, libsdl-framework has a nostatic variant, whereas the expat's one is named no_static. It would be nice to have some kind of naming guidelines for this kind of things. Why not an equivalent of the use.desc fi

Re: [11796] fixed auctex devel variant

2007-04-23 Thread Chris Pickel
On 23 Apr, 2007, at 13:33, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Someone committed the fix in the ticket. However, now we have the same problem reported against another port: http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/11819 I believe something is amiss in base. Someone who knows about base, please com

Re: [11796] fixed auctex devel variant

2007-04-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 21, 2007, at 03:13, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Apr 18, 2007, at 15:20, Dominik Fisch wrote: I've opened ticket #11796 to describe the build problem I experienced while trying to build auctex development variant. After playing around a bit I found the problem within the Portfile and sub

Re: Cached configure?

2007-04-23 Thread Boey Maun Suang
Hi Greg, Correct me if I'm wrong, but since I don't want to override the default configure arguments I think I want to use configure.args- append="-C", correct? You're absolutely right, but unfortunately I wasn't able to get configure.args-append to work from the command line, and the only

Re: Task #11664: cleaning *FLAGS in Portfiles

2007-04-23 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2007-04-19 14:09:07 +0900, Paul Guyot wrote: > Since 1.4.1, MacPorts automatically fills *FLAGS with -I${prefix}/include > and -L${prefix}/lib. > We can remove a lot of unnecessary lines from portfiles. I suggest that > every maintainer clean their own ports and check that they still compile

Re: startupitem.inetdcompat or newbie base hacking!

2007-04-23 Thread markd
> >> startupitem.inetdcompat >> startupitem.inetdcompat.socketsvcname >> startupitem.inetdcompat.nowait >> >> They are attached to this ticket: >> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11824 > >That looks pretty good. I'd love to hear feedback from others, but >I'd favor commiting t