Website documentation updates

2007-10-03 Thread Juan Manuel Palacios
Hello documentation team! (and, of course, anyone else who wants to lend a hand for the heavy lifting ;-) First off, I would like to apologize for having disappeared for the last couple of weeks, that annoying real life work thing hasn't left me with much extra time lately to work

Re: compiler selection

2007-10-03 Thread N_Ox
Le 30 sept. 07 à 13:57, Weissmann Markus a écrit : On 30.09.2007, at 12:13, Michael Wild wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Sep 28, 2007, at 14:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Sep 28, 2007, at 09:55, Michael Wild wrote: My problem actually is that a port which I'm preparing requires gfortran

Re: Split Trunk

2007-10-03 Thread Rainer Müller
Anders F Björklund wrote: For MacPorts 1.6.0, I think you should split the dports trunk in two, trunk and release, just as done with the base. There is just too much port breakage with running the latest developer version on the user machines, IMHO. That sounds like a good idea. But who

Re: Split Trunk

2007-10-03 Thread Randall Wood
On 3 Oct 2007, at 05:37, Rainer Müller wrote: Anders F Björklund wrote: For MacPorts 1.6.0, I think you should split the dports trunk in two, trunk and release, just as done with the base. There is just too much port breakage with running the latest developer version on the user machines,

Port update for qt4-mac

2007-10-03 Thread Michael Wild
Hi I submitted an updated Portfile for qt4-mac version 4.3.1. For the details see http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/12846 Quite a lot changed, so please have a close look at it. Regards Michael ___ macports-dev mailing list

Re: Split Trunk

2007-10-03 Thread N_Ox
Le 2 oct. 07 à 13:05, Michael Wild a écrit : Anders F Björklund wrote: For MacPorts 1.6.0, I think you should split the dports trunk in two, trunk and release, just as done with the base. There is just too much port breakage with running the latest developer version on the user machines,

Replacement for cd

2007-10-03 Thread Kevin Ballard
Since the cd command has been removed from trunk, perhaps another command could be added to fill in the void? I'm proposing a command that acts like cd but takes a block and executes the block within the given directory, then restores the old working directory before continuing on. Any

Re: Replacement for cd

2007-10-03 Thread Yves de Champlain
Le 07-10-02 à 18:23, Kevin Ballard a écrit : Since the cd command has been removed from trunk, perhaps another command could be added to fill in the void? I'm proposing a command that acts like cd but takes a block and executes the block within the given directory, then restores the old

Re: Split Trunk

2007-10-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 2, 2007, at 16:16, N_Ox wrote: Le 2 oct. 07 à 13:05, Michael Wild a écrit : Anders F Björklund wrote: For MacPorts 1.6.0, I think you should split the dports trunk in two, trunk and release, just as done with the base. There is just too much port breakage with running the latest

Re: Replacement for cd

2007-10-03 Thread Rainer Müller
Kevin Ballard wrote: Since the cd command has been removed from trunk, perhaps another command could be added to fill in the void? I'm proposing a command that acts like cd but takes a block and executes the block within the given directory, then restores the old working directory before