Hi everyone,
On 07/11/2007, at 04:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know I forgot that I still have port.1 and macports.conf.5
still to
go. And I'm going to be out of town for two weeks this month and
then the
holidays are here.
Sorry that I haven't been as active as I'd like, but if Mark
On Nov 6, 2007, at 15:26, Adam Mercer wrote:
Can someone with commit access please take a look at ticket #13176 [1]
which add py25-zlib as a dependency to the bazaar-ng port?
Committed! Thanks.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macos
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 12:05:47PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Content organization put aside, we have to figure a way to tie "make
> >man" in the doc-new dir with our make system in trunk/base, so that
>
> 1)
> >the regular "./co
Hi
Can someone with commit access please take a look at ticket #13176 [1]
which add py25-zlib as a dependency to the bazaar-ng port?
Cheers
Adam
[1] http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/13176
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lis
Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Content organization put aside, we have to figure a way to tie "make
>man" in the doc-new dir with our make system in trunk/base, so that
1)
>the regular "./configure && make && make install" dance (called
>either when installing fro
On Nov 5, 2007, at 15:16, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
It's very pleasing to see the amount of work that has gone into
base since our last release, but the negative side of that is that
our current code delta between trunk and the last release branch is
huge. Therefore I propose we make a 1
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:50, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
"port lint" (which is still a tad broken)
How broken? Anything too big that might prompt you to keep it from
shipping? Or is it just lacking some polishing that we could wait for?
Le 6 nov. 07 à 17:51, Juan Manuel Palacios a écrit :
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:01 AM, N_Ox wrote:
Le 6 nov. 07 à 07:05, Juan Manuel Palacios a écrit :
Does --with-tclpackage add some tcl code to the beginning of the
port executable to add the path to ${auto_path}?
Code is adde
On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
(Ryan, any reason why you orginally suggested "'(...) charset=' .
$encoding" rather than plain "'(...) charset=$encoding'"?)
My personal PHP code style is to avoid putting variables inside
double-quoted strings. In fact I try to avoid doubl
On Nov 5, 2007, at 23:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 30750
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/30750
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-11-05 21:18:07 -0800 (Mon, 05 Nov 2007)
Log Message:
---
Add a long-ago-suggested-by-Ryan header() to fie
Hello Ryan!
I think this question is long overdue, and in a way I would like to
apologize for apparently having ignored your seemingly interesting
work on Pallet thus far! But trust me, I haven't ;-)
So, mind filling us in on what you're doing with Pallet? What's the
scope of y
On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Overall, you think we should ship 1.6 with the old man pages still
in place or will the new ones be able to replace them, even if not
100% finished?
You know I forgot that I still ha
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Eugene Pimenov wrote:
*) Eugene, how "finished" would you call your work on trace mode
improvements? Other than bugs that you may fix as they are
reported, do you plan any major changes to the core of your work?
I'm not planing majo
Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Overall, you think we should ship 1.6 with the old man pages still
>in place or will the new ones be able to replace them, even if not
>100% finished?
You know I forgot that I still have port.1 and macports.conf.5 still to
go. And I'm g
On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
-) does any developer in particular plan to include new features/
improvements in the near future? If so, do these entail any
obvious instability we should account for?
The "mpkg" target is left to update to
On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Weissmann Markus wrote:
On 05.11.2007, at 22:16, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Hey everyone!
It's very pleasing to see the amount of work that has gone into
base since our last release, but the negative side of that is that
our current code delta betwee
On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
-) documentation people, can we count on rewritten man pages to go
with 1.6? How far off is the new guide?
I think it will be awhile before the man pages and guide are done, but
work is ongo
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:01 AM, N_Ox wrote:
Le 6 nov. 07 à 07:05, Juan Manuel Palacios a écrit :
So, do we have an agreement on this? Any objections to turning on
warnings against /Library/Frameworks in the upcoming MacPorts 1.6?
I support to move to discourage writing to that directory,
Denis Tkachov wrote:
I am looking for a way to import data from excel on Mac OS X.
Development platform - c++ (xcode).
Can anybody point me to the way how it may by done on Mac OS?
Any help is appreciated.
Best regards,
Denis
This is really OT for this list...
You can get at Excel data via Ap
Eugene Pimenov wrote:
*) Eugene, how "finished" would you call your work on trace mode
improvements? Other than bugs that you may fix as they are reported,
do you plan any major changes to the core of your work?
I'm not planing major changes. I build every port with it, and seems
it work go
I am looking for a way to import data from excel on Mac OS X.
Development platform - c++ (xcode).
Can anybody point me to the way how it may by done on Mac OS?
Any help is appreciated.
Best regards,
Denis
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/excel-data-import-on-Mac-OS-X-tf475
Le 6 nov. 07 à 07:05, Juan Manuel Palacios a écrit :
So, do we have an agreement on this? Any objections to turning on
warnings against /Library/Frameworks in the upcoming MacPorts 1.6?
I support to move to discourage writing to that directory, gcc's -F
flag should allow any application
On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Randall Wood wrote:
So, do we have an agreement on this? Any objections to turning
on warnings against /Library/Frameworks in the upcoming MacPorts
1.6? I support to move to discourage writing to that directory,
gcc's -F flag should
On 06/11/07 15:28, Weissmann Markus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would it be possible to supply a diff? The attached files has practically
> nothing in common with the Portfile in trunk:
> $ slrn-devel> diff -u Portfile slrn-devel.portfile | wc -l
> 92
> $ slrn-devel> wc -l *
> 50 Portfile
>
Hi,
would it be possible to supply a diff? The attached files has
practically nothing in common with the Portfile in trunk:
$ slrn-devel> diff -u Portfile slrn-devel.portfile | wc -l
92
$ slrn-devel> wc -l *
50 Portfile
43 slrn-devel.portfile
93 total
-Markus
On 06.1
06.11.2007, в 0:16, Juan Manuel Palacios написал(а):
*) Eugene, how "finished" would you call your work on trace mode
improvements? Other than bugs that you may fix as they are reported,
do you plan any major changes to the core of your work?
I'm not planing major changes. I build ever
Hi,
I tried to file this on trac, but after pushing "preview and submit
changes" the connection hangs and the ticket fails to be uploaded.
I'm the maintainer of the slrn-devel package but I don't have the commit bit.
Can
someone please upgrade this for me?
I'm not also used to upload sources tar
Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
-) does any developer in particular plan to include new
features/improvements in the near future? If so, do these entail any
obvious instability we should account for?
The "mpkg" target is left to update to PackageMaker, and
rpm/python/yum/smart/etc will be update
Randall Wood wrote:
So, do we have an agreement on this? Any objections to turning on
warnings against /Library/Frameworks in the upcoming MacPorts 1.6? I
support to move to discourage writing to that directory, gcc's -F
flag should allow any application needing a framework to look for it
un
On 05.11.2007, at 22:16, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Hey everyone!
It's very pleasing to see the amount of work that has gone into
base since our last release, but the negative side of that is that
our current code delta between trunk and the last release branch is
huge. Therefor
On 6 Nov 2007, at 01:05, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
So, do we have an agreement on this? Any objections to turning on
warnings against /Library/Frameworks in the upcoming MacPorts 1.6?
I support to move to discourage writing to that directory, gcc's -F
flag should allow any application
31 matches
Mail list logo
