Two small ports, fdupes packddir

Hello, I've filed two tickets about two small utilities that have no dependencies, tickets numbers are 13109 and 13133. It's my first attempt at writing a Portfile from scratch so pls have a look at them. Bye Andrea ___ macports-dev mailing lis

Re: [30830] trunk/dports/devel/dialog/Portfile

On 8.11.2007, at 9.41, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Is there a reason why you're not just enabling this all the time? Why is it a variant? Well, that was the request. Maybe this could be lifted to be default in the next revision… ! ! Jyrki Wahlstedt ! http://www.wahlstedt.fi/jyrki/ ! ! Our

bochs updated

Hi, I've just filed ticket 13194 with the bochs Portfile for 2.3.5, pls have a look. Bye Andrea ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/m

Re: [30830] trunk/dports/devel/dialog/Portfile

On Nov 8, 2007, at 01:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision: 30830 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/30830 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007-11-07 23:20:19 -0800 (Wed, 07 Nov 2007) Log Message: --- adding variant utf8 per request in ticket #13118,

Re: [30735] trunk/doc-new/man/xml/portfile-phase.7.xml

"Daniel J. Luke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >The -j is actually a make option. > >The make manpage describes it like this: > -j [jobs], --jobs[=jobs] > Specifies the number of jobs (commands) to run >simultaneously. If > there is more than one -j option, the last

Re: Trac problems and slrn-devel upgrade

On 07.11.2007, at 21:34, Sbranzo wrote: On 06/11/07 15:28, Weissmann Markus wrote: would it be possible to supply a diff? The attached files has practically nothing in common with the Portfile in trunk: $ slrn-devel> diff -u Portfile slrn-devel.portfile | wc -l 92 $ slrn-devel> wc -l *

Re: Trac problems and slrn-devel upgrade

On 06/11/07 15:28, Weissmann Markus wrote: > would it be possible to supply a diff? The attached files has practically > nothing in common with the Portfile in trunk: > $ slrn-devel> diff -u Portfile slrn-devel.portfile | wc -l > 92 > $ slrn-devel> wc -l * > 50 Portfile > 43 slrn

Re: Pallet...?

On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Randall Wood wrote: On Tuesday, November 06, 2007, at 01:36PM, "Juan Manuel Palacios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Ryan! I'm not aware that Ryan has done any work on Pallet either. That said, if he wants to, he's welcome to. I'm so sorry *Rand

Ghemical port and Glut problems

Hi, I tried to create a port for Ghemical [1] and had some problems. After some tries I got it working, but only by patching Glut. The problem is that Glut tries to include GL/gl.h and GL/glu.h which don't exist. So I had to change them to OpenGl/gl.h and OpenGL/glu.h. I also had to change the in

Re: Pallet...?

On Nov 7, 2007, at 09:23, Randall Wood wrote: On Tuesday, November 06, 2007, at 01:36PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote: Hello Ryan! I'm not aware that Ryan has done any work on Pallet either. That said, if he wants to, he's welcome to. I wasn't aware of that either. ;-P ___

Re: Pallet...?

On Tuesday, November 06, 2007, at 01:36PM, "Juan Manuel Palacios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Ryan! I'm not aware that Ryan has done any work on Pallet either. That said, if he wants to, he's welcome to. > I think this question is long overdue, and in a way I would like to