Re: [33639] branches/release_1_6/base/portmgr/dmg/postflight

On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision 33639 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2008-02-01 23:16:35 -0800 (Fri, 01 Feb 2008) Log Message * Use dscl(1) to detect the default shell for the installing user, rather than trying to infer it from the inherited environment (whi

Re: [33653] trunk/dports/net/psi/Portfile

Looks like you didn't commit the patchfiles. $ sudo port checksum psi +plugins ---> Fetching psi ---> Attempting to fetch patch-src_about.ui from http:// svn.macports.org/repository/macports/distfiles/psi ---> Attempting to fetch patch-src_about.ui from http:// svn.macports.org/repository/ma

macports-users list dead?

I haven't seen any mail on macports-users since the 29th of January; also, the archives[1] appear to stop at that same day, so I don't think it's an issue with my delivery alone. Bryan [1] -

Re: macports-users list dead?

I'm looking into it. Thanks for reporting it. -Bill On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Bryan Blackburn wrote: I haven't seen any mail on macports-users since the 29th of January; also, the archives[1] appear to stop at that same day, so I don't think it's an issue with my delivery alone. Bryan

macports-users has been fixed

Sorry for the oversight, there was a mis-set permission on the server for macports-users. All the mail got deferred and has now been delivered. -Bill William Siegrist Software Support Engineer Mac OS Forge http://macosforge.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 408 862 7337 smime.p7s Descrip

Re: [MacPorts] #14147: port lint should warn on illegal variant names

MacPorts wrote: #14147: port lint should warn on illegal variant names -+-- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Type: enhancement | Status: new

*-devel ports

The guide needs to say something (quite a lot, actually) about *- devel ports. The only thing it currently says is: "Non-port dependencies should only be used if the application or library can be installed by multiple ports (for example stable and - devel version) or if it can't be installed

Re: *-devel ports

Ryan Schmidt wrote: No port should depend on a -devel version of a port, unless it will only work with the -devel version. Usually this will not be the case. Usually, a port will work with the current version of a port and the latest development version. A port wanting to accommodate this situa

Re: *-devel ports

On Feb 2, 2008, at 18:49, Rainer Müller wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: No port should depend on a -devel version of a port, unless it will only work with the -devel version. Usually this will not be the case. Usually, a port will work with the current version of a port and the latest develop