Before anyone does anything, I'd like to know why you want this
change.
Consistency, period.
When I upgraded from apache1 to apache2, it surprized me that
there is no conf dir in /opt/local/etc and apachectl is in
/opt/local/apache2/bin/.
Let's figure out the pros and cons.
A con would be
js wrote:
Before anyone does anything, I'd like to know why you want this
change.
Consistency, period.
When I upgraded from apache1 to apache2, it surprized me that
there is no conf dir in /opt/local/etc and apachectl is in
/opt/local/apache2/bin/.
I agree. Even more, the current apache2
On Mar 1, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
Is there a way that I can check if a given port is installed in a
pre-fetch phase and display a message, e.g. using ui_msg, if the port
is installed?
You can do almost anything from within a portfile, but there are lots
of things that you
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Daniel J. Luke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can do almost anything from within a portfile, but there are lots
of things that you maybe shouldn't.
What are you trying to accomplish?
I want to upgrade the science/geos port to 3.0.0 but
matplotlib-basemap
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts
should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
.
You might be inclined to address any of the following
On 3/2/08, Eric Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts
should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
.
You
Randall Wood wrote:
On 3/2/08, Eric Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts
should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See
On Mar 2, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Randall Wood wrote:
I would like to see MacPorts use RPM for its installation database
instead of whatever we have now.
We don't have anything now. We've also tried to use rpm at various
times in the past, but the impedance matching requirements have always
