Re: distfiles.macports.org

2008-05-30 Thread Rainer Müller
Joshua Root wrote: People can start relying on the mirror and building it into port1.0 Done: http://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/15456/d.m.o.diff :-D Nice implementation. Patch works fine here! As you use port mirror for this task now, can we revert the addition of port distfiles?

Re: distfiles.macports.org

2008-05-30 Thread Joshua Root
Rainer Müller wrote: Another topic: Some time ago we had the idea to generate usage statistics by counting distfiles downloads from the macports distfiles mirror. If we still want to do this, we would have to add the macports distfiles mirror at the top of the list, so everybody tries that

Re: distfiles.macports.org

2008-05-30 Thread William Siegrist
On May 30, 2008, at 4:40 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: Joshua Root wrote: People can start relying on the mirror and building it into port1.0 Done: http://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/15456/d.m.o.diff :-D Nice implementation. Patch works fine here! As you use port mirror for this task

Re: distfiles.macports.org

2008-05-30 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 30, 2008, at 06:40, Rainer Müller wrote: People can start relying on the mirror and building it into port1.0 Done: http://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/15456/d.m.o.diff :-D Nice implementation. Patch works fine here! As you use port mirror for this task now, can we revert the

Re: distfiles.macports.org

2008-05-30 Thread William Siegrist
On May 30, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On May 30, 2008, at 06:40, Rainer Müller wrote: But this would make this shiny new ping sort feature useless. What is more important for use? Probably faster downloads or pseudo usage statistics? Why don't we keep the nice ping feature for