On Oct 14, 2008, at 08:39, James Berry wrote:
> The (current) PortMgr team is pleased to be able to announce the
> appointment of a new PortMgr team.
>
> Four people expressed interest in the PortMgr positions, and have
> all been appointed by proclamation:
>
> Ryan Schmidt
> Raine
On Oct 14, 2008, at 18:54, Thomas Keller wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt schrieb:
>
>> On Oct 14, 2008, at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Revision: 40784
>>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/40784
>>> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Date: 2008-10-14 15:38:14 -0700 (Tue, 14 Oct 2008)
On Oct 14, 2008, at 18:46, Joshua Root wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Have you tested what happens if a user has "DisTract" installed and
>> then you update the port to a new version when it's called "distract"
>> and the user needs to upgrade? Does "port outdated" consider
>> "DisTract" and "d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Schmidt schrieb:
>
> On Oct 14, 2008, at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Revision: 40784
>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/40784
>> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Date: 2008-10-14 15:38:14 -0700 (Tue, 14 Oct 2008)
>> Log M
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Have you tested what happens if a user has "DisTract" installed and
> then you update the port to a new version when it's called "distract"
> and the user needs to upgrade? Does "port outdated" consider
> "DisTract" and "distract" to be the same thing -- does it properly
On Oct 14, 2008, at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Revision: 40784
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/40784
> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2008-10-14 15:38:14 -0700 (Tue, 14 Oct 2008)
> Log Message:
> ---
> * distract: make the port's name lowercase so it matches
Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi James et al,
>
> Are there any explicit "terms of service" (in both senses of the
> phrase :-)?
>
> I'd like to propose that the new team commit to serve from Oct 1st,
> 2008 (retroactively) to Oct 1st, 2009, with an option for them to
> renew in one year block
Hi Ernie,
Your question is an excellent one, and probably one best addressed by
the new portmgr team... I think your proposal sounds good.
James
On Oct 14, 2008, at 9:12 AM, Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi James et al,
>
> Are there any explicit "terms of service" (in both senses of the
> phr
On Oct 14, 2008, at 04:06, Randall Wood wrote:
>> I don't know the implications of having the frameworks outside of /
>> Library/Frameworks (e.g. in ${prefix}/Library/Frameworks) but for
>> applications I thought the point was that the OS wouldn't know about
>> them (e.g. things like "open -a foo
Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi James et al,
>
> Are there any explicit "terms of service" (in both senses of the
> phrase :-)?
Personally, I think it's high past time to throw the bums out! This
announcement went out over three hours ago, and I still don't see any binary
packages. My platform
Awesome! I would like to suggest to the new PortMgr team that, as
their first official act, they quickly appoint some folks to do
Release Engineering duties before those someones change their minds. :-)
- Jordan
On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:39 AM, James Berry wrote:
> The (current) PortMgr team is
Hi James et al,
Are there any explicit "terms of service" (in both senses of the
phrase :-)?
I'd like to propose that the new team commit to serve from Oct 1st,
2008 (retroactively) to Oct 1st, 2009, with an option for them to
renew in one year blocks.
In particular, they need to indicate
On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:39 AM, James Berry wrote:
> The (current) PortMgr team is pleased to be able to announce the
> appointment of a new PortMgr team.
>
> Four people expressed interest in the PortMgr positions, and have
> all been appointed by proclamation:
>
> Ryan Schmidt
> Ra
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:39 PM, James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The (current) PortMgr team is pleased to be able to announce the appointment
> of a new PortMgr team.
>
> Four people expressed interest in the PortMgr positions, and have all been
> appointed by proclamation:
>
>Ryan
Congratulations!
On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:39 AM, James Berry wrote:
> The (current) PortMgr team is pleased to be able to announce the
> appointment of a new PortMgr team.
>
> Four people expressed interest in the PortMgr positions, and have
> all been appointed by proclamation:
>
> Ryan S
The (current) PortMgr team is pleased to be able to announce the
appointment of a new PortMgr team.
Four people expressed interest in the PortMgr positions, and have all
been appointed by proclamation:
Ryan Schmidt
Rainer Müller
Joshua Root
Bryan Blackburn
W
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2008, at 04:02, Anders F Björklund wrote:
>
>> The configure scripts used the /Applications and /Library locations
>> (or ~/Applications and ~/Library) because that was the rule at the
>> time,
>> made it easier t
Hi,
> Based on the amount of interest, we'll decide on an appropriate way to
> select the new slate.
can you give a status update?
Florian
--
Florian Ebeling
Twitter: febeling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosf
18 matches
Mail list logo
