Re: upgrading cyrus-sasl2

Bryan Blackburn wrote: > That's 12288: > > > > so much-improved in 1.7. > > Though the port in need of an upgrade was still installed just deactivated, > so the big question is whether outdated should pay attention to deactivated > as well? And I think fo

Re: [42296] trunk/dports/databases/db46/Portfile

On Nov 19, 2008, at 16:19, Trannie Carter wrote: One question and a little suggestion: Why a variant for this small utility? You mean as opposed to making it part of the default build? I agree that it is a relatively small utility to get its own variant. The db44 port enabled db_dum

Re: upgrading cyrus-sasl2

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:09:51AM +0100, nox said: > Le 20 nov. 08 à 01:44, Mark Hattam a écrit : > >> iMac:~ mark$ sudo port upgrade outdated >> ---> Building cyrus-sasl2 with target all >> Error: cyrus-sasl2 must be deactivated before upgrade. >> Error: Target org.macports.build returned: Pleas

Re: upgrading cyrus-sasl2

Le 20 nov. 08 à 01:44, Mark Hattam a écrit : iMac:~ mark$ sudo port upgrade outdated ---> Building cyrus-sasl2 with target all Error: cyrus-sasl2 must be deactivated before upgrade. Error: Target org.macports.build returned: Please run `sudo port deactivate cyrus-sasl2` and try again. Error:

Re: [42296] trunk/dports/databases/db46/Portfile

Le 20 nov. 08 à 00:18, Rainer Müller a écrit : Trannie Carter wrote: Instead of testing whether the variant is set, you could write another post-destroot block in the variant itself. Oh, I'm not familiar with that pattern. I modeled that section after the MacPorts Guide section 4.4.2 Va

Re: [42296] trunk/dports/databases/db46/Portfile

Trannie Carter wrote: >> Instead of testing whether the variant is set, you could write another >> post-destroot block in the variant itself. > > Oh, I'm not familiar with that pattern. I modeled that section after the > MacPorts Guide section 4.4.2 Variant Actions in a Phase. Maybe this new sty

Re: [42296] trunk/dports/databases/db46/Portfile

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:07 AM, nox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> + >> +if { [ variant_isset dump185 ] } { >> +move ${destroot}${prefix}/bin/db_dump185 \ >> +${destroot}${prefix}/bin/db46_dump185 >> +} >> } >> > One questio